|
This article has been retrieved
times since March 10, 2005
Volume 13 Number 21
|
March 21, 2005
|
ISSN 1068-2341
|
Texas Charter School Legislation and the
Evolution of Open-Enrollment Charter Schools
Carrie Y. Barron Ausbrooks
Edith J. Barrett
Theresa Daniel
The University of Texas at Arlington
Citation: Ausbrooks, C. Y. B., Barrett, E. J. & Daniel, T. (2005 March 21). Texas charter
school legislation and the evolution of open-enrollment charter schools. Education Policy
Analysis Archives, 13(21). Retrieved [date] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n21/.
This article was accepted
by the previous Editor, Gene V Glass (1993-2004).
Abstract
This article chronicles the evolution of legislation for Texas open-enrollment
charter schools to their implementation by demonstrating how these schools
have (or have not) used their freedom from state-mandated requirements to
develop innovative learning environments as well as to bring innovative
curricula into the classroom. The investigative focus was on an analysis of
Texas open-enrollment charter school legislation, from 1995 (74th legislative
session) to the 77th legislative session in 2001, and the characteristics of the
state’s 159 open-enrollment charter schools that were in operation during the
2001-2002 academic year. The authors found that charter school legislation
has changed in response to concerns of all involved, and focuses on the need
for balance between choice, innovation, and public accountability. Although
charter schools are free from most state regulations, legislators were clearly
interested in ensuring that this freedom does not impede charter schools’
ability to provide a quality education to all students who attend them. The
currently operating open-enrollment charter schools in Texas are more racially
and economically segregated than other public schools in the state, and charter
schools that targeted students most at risk for dropping out of school (and
returning students who had previously dropped out) differ from other schools
in their stated teaching methods. Teacher turnover remains significantly
greater than that for other public schools in the state. However, it does not
appear to be specifically associated with schools that target disadvantaged
students or minority students. The schools’ mission statements suggest that
innovative school environments are a factor in school design. Texas is poised
to continue along the public education choice model. Charter school
legislation provides a framework upon which charter schools may build to
meet the educational needs of the students who choose to attend them,
including the freedom to be creative in meeting students’ unique needs.
Questions remain about how and why charter schools exist and the
contributions they make to the overall public school system, including
whether charters are making a difference in what and how much children are
learning.
|
Access this article in PDF format.
|
The World Wide Web address for the Education
Policy Analysis Archives is
epaa.asu.edu
Editor: Sherman Dorn, University of South Florida
Production Assistant: Chris Murrell, Arizona State
University
General questions about appropriateness of topics
or particular articles may be addressed to the Editor,
Sherman Dorn,
epaa-editor@shermandorn.com.
The Commentary Editor is Casey D. Cobb:
casey.cobb@uconn.edu.
EPAA Editorial Board
EPAA Spanish & Portuguese Language Editorial Board
Associate Editors
Gustavo E. Fischman
Arizona State University
& Pablo Gentili Laboratório de Políticas Públicas
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Argentina
- Alejandra Birgin
Ministerio de Educación, Argentina
Email: abirgin@me.gov.ar
- Mónica Pini
Universidad Nacional de San Martin, Argentina
Email: mopinos@hotmail.com,
- Mariano Narodowski
Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Argentina
Email:
- Daniel Suarez
Laboratorio de Politicas Publicas-Universidad de Buenos
Aires, Argentina Email: daniel@lpp-buenosaires.net
Brasil
- Gaudêncio Frigotto
Professor da Faculdade de Educação e do Programa de
Pós-Graduação em Educação da Universidade
Federal Fluminense, Brasil Email: gfrigotto@globo.com
- Vanilda Paiva
Email:vppaiva@terra.com.br
- Lilian do Valle
Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Email: lvalle@infolink.com.br
- Romualdo Portella do Oliveira
Universidade de São Paulo,
Brasil Email: romualdo@usp.br
- Roberto Leher
Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Email: rleher@uol.com.br
- Dalila Andrade de Oliveira
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo
Horizonte, Brasil
Email: dalila@fae.ufmg.br
- Nilma Limo Gomes
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte
Email: nilmagomes@uol.com.br
- Iolanda de Oliveira
Faculdade de Educação da Universidade Federal
Fluminense, Brasil
Email: iolanda.eustaquio@globo.com
- Walter Kohan
Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Email: walterko@uol.com.br
Canadá
-
Daniel Schugurensky
Ontario Institute for Studies in
Education, University of Toronto, Canada
Email: dschugurensky@oise.utoronto.ca
Chile
- Claudio Almonacid Avila
Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la
Educación, Chile
Email: caa@rdc.cl
- María Loreto Egaña
Programa Interdisciplinario de Investigación en
Educación (PIIE), Chile
Email: legana@academia.cl
España
- José Gimeno Sacristán
Catedratico en el Departamento de Didáctica y
Organización Escolar de la Universidad de Valencia, España
Email: Jose.Gimeno@uv.es
- Mariano Fernández Enguita
Catedrático de Sociología en la Universidad de
Salamanca. España
Email: enguita@usal.es
- Miguel Pereira
Catedratico Universidad de Granada, España
Email: mpereyra@aulae.es
-
Jurjo Torres Santomé
Universidad de A Coruña
Email: jurjo@udc.es
- Angel Ignacio Pérez Gómez
Universidad de Málaga
Email: aiperez@uma.es
México
- Hugo Aboites
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco,
México
Email: aavh4435@cueyatl.uam.mx
- Susan Street
Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en
Antropologia Social Occidente, Guadalajara, México
Email: slsn@mail.udg.mx
-
Adrián Acosta
Universidad de Guadalajara
Email: adrianacosta@compuserve.com
-
Teresa Bracho
Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económica-CIDE
Email: bracho dis1.cide.mx
-
Alejandro Canales
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Email: canalesa@servidor.unam.mx
-
Rollin Kent
Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. Puebla, México
Email: rkent@puebla.megared.net.mx
Perú
- Sigfredo Chiroque
Instituto de Pedagogía Popular, Perú
Email: pedagogia@chavin.rcp.net.pe
- Grover Pango
Coordinador General del Foro Latinoamericano de Políticas
Educativas, Perú
Email: grover-eduforo@terra.com.pe
Portugal
- Antonio Teodoro
Director da Licenciatura de Ciências da Educação e do
Mestrado Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Lisboa,
Portugal
Email: a.teodoro@netvisao.pt
USA
- Pia Lindquist Wong
California State University,
Sacramento, California Email: wongp@csus.edu
- Nelly P. Stromquist
University of Southern California, Los Angeles,
California Email: nellystromquist@juno.com
- Diana Rhoten
Social Science Research Council,
New York, New York Email: rhoten@ssrc.org
- Daniel C. Levy
University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, New York
Email: Dlevy@uamail.albany.edu
-
Ursula Casanova
Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
Email: casanova@asu.edu
-
Erwin Epstein
Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois
Email: eepstei@wpo.it.luc.edu
-
Carlos A. Torres
University of California, Los Angeles
Email: torres@gseisucla.edu
|
|
|