EPAA Vol. 14 No. 28 School Size, Student Achievement, and the "Power Rating" of Poverty: Substantive Finding or Statistical Artifact?
 
 
   A peer-reviewed scholarly journal  
Editor: Sherman Dorn
College of Education
University of South Florida
epaa home
complete articles
editors
submit
article
submit commentary
receive publication notices
search
epaa
 

Copyright is retained by the first or sole author, who grants right of first publication to the EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS ARCHIVES. EPAA is a publication of the Colleges of Education at Arizona State University and the University of South Florida. Articles published in EPAA are indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals.

This article is available in PDF format: pdf.gif

 

This article has been retrieved   times since November 3, 2006

Volume 14 Number 28
November 3, 2006
ISSN 1068-2341

School Size, Student Achievement, and the "Power Rating" of Poverty:
Substantive Finding or Statistical Artifact?

Theodore Coladarci
University of Maine

Citation: Coladarci, T. (2006). School size, student achievement, and the "power rating" of poverty: Substantive finding or statistical artifact? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(28). Retrieved [date] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n28/.

Abstract

The proportion of variance in student achievement that is explained by student SES-"poverty's power rating," as some call it-tends to be lower among smaller schools than among larger schools. Smaller schools, many claim, are able to somehow disrupt the seemingly axiomatic association between SES and student achievement. Using eighth-grade data for 216 public schools in Maine, I explored the hypothesis that this in part is a statistical artifact of the greater volatility (lower reliability) of school-aggregated student achievement in smaller schools. This hypothesis received no support when reading achievement served as the dependent variable. In contrast, the hypothesis was supported when the dependent variable was mathematics achievement. For reasons considered in the discussion, however, I ultimately concluded that the latter results are insufficient to affirm the statistical-artifact hypothesis here as well. Implications for subsequent research are discussed.

Keywords: small schools; student achievement; socioeconomic status;, rural education.

Access this article in PDF format.

 


some rights reservedReaders are free to copy, display, and distribute this abstract and the associated article, as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and Education Policy Analysis Archives, it is distributed for non-commercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work. All other uses must be approved by the author(s) or EPAA. EPAA is published jointly by the Mary Lou Fulton College of Education at Arizona State University and the College of Education at the University of South Florida. Articles are indexed by H.W. Wilson & Co. Please contribute commentary at http://epaa.info/wordpress/ and send errata notes to Sherman Dorn (epaa-editor@shermandorn.com).

 

epaa home
complete articles
editors
submit
article
submit commentary
receive publication notices
search
epaa