
 
 
   A peer-reviewed scholarly journal  
Editor: Sherman Dorn
College of Education
University of South Florida
epaa home
complete articles
editors
submit
article
submit commentary
receive publication notices
search
epaa
 

Copyright is retained by the first or sole author, who grants right of first publication to the EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS ARCHIVES. EPAA is a publication of the Mary Lou Fulton Institute and Graduate School of Education at Arizona State University and the University of South Florida. Articles published in EPAA are indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals, ERIC, H.W. Wilson & Co, and SCOPUS.

This article is available in PDF format: pdf.gif

 

This article has been retrieved   times since July 1, 2008

Volume 16 Number 13
July 1, 2008
ISSN 1068-2341

The Cost-Effectiveness of Comprehensive School Reform and Rapid Assessment

Stuart S. Yeh
University of Minnesota

Citation: Yeh, S. S. (2008). The cost-effectiveness of comprehensive school reform and rapid assessment. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 16(13). Retrieved [date] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v16n13/.

Abstract

Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of 29 Comprehensive School Reform (CSR) models suggests that all 29 models are less cost-effective than an alternative approach for raising student achievement, involving rapid assessment systems that test students 2 to 5 times per week in math and reading and provide rapid feedback of the results to students and teachers. Results suggest that reading and math achievement could increase approximately one order of magnitude greater for every dollar invested in rapid assessment rather than CSR. The results also suggest that reading and math achievement could increase two orders of magnitude for every dollar invested in rapid assessment rather than class size reduction and three orders of magnitude for every dollar invested in rapid assessment rather than high quality preschool.
Keywords: comprehensive school reform; formative evaluation; cost effectiveness; reading; math

La relación costo-eficacia de reformas escolares comprensivas y evaluaciones rápidas

Resumen
Análisis de la relación costo-eficacia, de 29 modelos de reformas escolares comprensivas(REC) sugiere que todos esos modelos son menos rentables que un enfoque alternativo para aumentar el rendimiento de los estudiantes, que involucra sistemas de evaluación rápidos que ponen a prueba los estudiantes de 2 a 5 veces por semana en las áreas de matemáticas y lectura, proporcionando información de los resultados a los estudiantes y profesores de manera rápida. Los resultados sugieren que por cada dólar invertido se podría aumentar el aprendizaje de la lectura y matemáticas en un orden de magnitud mayor usando el sistema de eva rápida en lugar de la REC. Los resultados también sugieren que el aprendizaje de la lectura y matemáticas podría aumentar dos órdenes de magnitud por cada dólar invertido usando evaluación rápida en lugar de reducir el tamaño de las clases y tres órdenes de magnitud por cada dólar invertido usando evaluación rápida en vez de invertir en educación preescolar de calidad.
Palabras clave: reformas escolares comprensivas; evaluación formativa; costo-eficacia; lectura; matemáticas.

Access this article in PDF format.

Education Policy Analysis Archives, class size, David Berliner, Gene Glass, Michael Apple, Sherman Dorn, Gustavo Fischman, Pablo Gentili, education policy analysis archives, epaa, aape, education, Paulo Freire, reforma educativa, archivos analiticos politicas educativas, neoliberalismo, descentralizacion, evaluacion, pruebas nacionales, estandares, lectura, revista educativa, revista academica, pruebas, sindicatos docentes, gremios, profesores, universidades, escuelas publicas, escuelas privadas, escuelas charter, policy, educational policy, policy analysis, vouchers, charter schools, evaluation, educational evaluation, education reform, school reform, educational reform, educational journals, accountability, school choice, standards, higher education, academic standards, testing, assessment, public policy, teaching, journal, educational research, private schools, homeschooling, home schooling, tuition, teacher unions, educational assessment,política, política educacional, análise de política, comprovantes, escolas da carta patente, avaliação, avaliação educacional, reforma dainstrução, reforma de escola, reforma educacional, jornais educacionais, accountability, escolha da escola, educacion popular; pedagogia critica, Education Policy Analysis Archives, class size, David Berliner, Gene Glass, Michael Apple, Sherman Dorn, Gustavo Fischman, Pablo Gentili, education policy analysis archives, epaa, aape, education, Paulo Freire, reforma educativa, archivos analiticos politicas educativas, neoliberalismo, descentralizacion, evaluacion, pruebas nacionales, estandares, lectura, revista educativa, revista academica, pruebas, sindicatos docentes, gremios, profesores, universidades, escuelas publicas, escuelas privadas, escuelas charter, policy, educational policy, policy analysis, vouchers, charter schools, evaluation, educational evaluation, education reform, school reform, educational reform, educational journals, accountability, school choice, standards, higher education, academic standards, testing, assessment, public policy, teaching, journal, educational research, private schools, homeschooling, home schooling, tuition, teacher unions, educational assessment,política, política educacional, análise de política, comprovantes, escolas da carta patente, avaliação, avaliação educacional, reforma da instrução, reforma de escola, reforma educacional, jornais educacionais, accountability, escolha da escola

 


some rights reserved Readers are free to copy, display, and distribute this abstract and the associated article, as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and Education Policy Analysis Archives, it is distributed for non-commercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work. All other uses must be approved by the author(s) or EPAA. EPAA is published jointly by the Mary Lou Fulton Institute and Graduate School of Education at Arizona State University and the College of Education at the University of South Florida. Articles are indexed by Directory of Open Access Journals, ERIC, H.W. Wilson & Co, and SCOPUS. Please contribute commentary at http://epaa.info/wordpress/ and send errata notes to Sherman Dorn (epaa-editor@shermandorn.com).

 

epaa home
complete articles
editors
submit
article
submit commentary
receive publication notices
search
epaa

 

ó