
 
 
   A peer-reviewed scholarly journal  
Editor: Sherman Dorn
College of Education
University of South Florida
epaa home
complete articles
editors
submit
article
submit commentary
receive publication notices
search
epaa
 

Copyright is retained by the first or sole author, who grants right of first publication to the EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS ARCHIVES. EPAA is a publication of the Mary Lou Fulton Institute and Graduate School of Education at Arizona State University and the University of South Florida. Articles published in EPAA are indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals, ERIC, H.W. Wilson & Co, and SCOPUS.

This article is available in PDF format: pdf.gif

 

This article has been retrieved   times since May 12, 2009

Volume 17 Number 9
May 12, 2009
ISSN 1068-2341

Researcher Perspectives on Class Size Reduction

Elizabeth Graue
Erica Rauscher
Wisconsin Center for Education Research
University of Wisconsin Madison

Citation: Graue, E., & Rauscher, E. (2009). Researcher perspectives on class size reduction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 17(9). Retrieved [date] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v17n9/.

Abstract

This article applies to class size research Grant and Graue’s (1999) position that reviews of research represent conversations in the academic community. By extending our understanding of the class size reduction conversation beyond published literature to the perspectives of researchers who have studied the topic, we create a review that includes political histories of, contextual details about, and assumptions undergirding the conversation. We find divergent (and sometimes competing) perspectives on identifying beneficiaries of class size reduction (or CSR) and the correct context in which to view CSR research. By contrasting the logic and assumptions embedded in pupil-teacher ratio (PTR), class size (CS), and class size reduction studies, we conclude that sometimes research conflates these constructs and their associated theories of action, and such distortion poorly serves the needs of policymakers and stakeholders in education. We recommend that future inquiry focus on mechanisms of change, particularly instruction—both in terms of instructional strategies that capitalize on the resource of a smaller group and the types of support needed for teacher and administrator professional development.
Keywords: class size; teacher student ratio; educational policy

Perspectivas de un Investigador sobre la Reducción del Tamaño de Clases

Resumen
Este artículo aplica la perspectiva de Grant y Graue (1999) de que las revisiones de investigaciones son conversaciones entre comunidades académicas, para el caso de las investigaciones sobre tamaño de la clase. Al ampliar nuestra comprensión sobre la reducción de tamaño de las clases, más allá de la literatura publicada, a las perspectivas de investigadores que han estudiado el tema, estamos creando una revisión que incluye las historias de las políticas, los detalles acerca del contexto, y las hipótesis que sustentan las conversaciones acerca de esas investigaciones. Encontramos diferentes perspectivas (a veces en competencia) en la identificación de los beneficiarios de las propuestas de reducción de tamaño de clase (o RSE) y cual seria contexto apropiado para entender las investigaciones sobre RSE. Contrastando la lógica y los supuestos incorporados en las relaciones “alumnos por maestro” (PTR), el “tamaño de la clase” (CS), y la reducción de tamaño de las clases, llegamos a la conclusión de que a veces estas investigaciones confunden estos conceptos y las teorías de acción derivadas de los mismos, y que tal distorsión perjudica las tareas de los encargados de formular políticas educativas. Recomendamos que en el futuro las investigaciones atiendan fundamentalmente los mecanismos de cambio, en particular los relacionados con la instrucción, tanto en términos de estrategias de enseñanza que aprovecha los recursos que surgen al trabajar con un grupo más pequeño y los tipos de apoyo necesarios para el desarrollo profesional de los/as profesores/as y administradores/as.

Access this article in PDF format.

Education Policy Analysis Archives, class size, David Berliner, Gene Glass, Michael Apple, Sherman Dorn, Gustavo Fischman, Pablo Gentili, education policy analysis archives, epaa, aape, education, Paulo Freire, reforma educativa, archivos analiticos politicas educativas, neoliberalismo, descentralizacion, evaluacion, pruebas nacionales, estandares, lectura, revista educativa, revista academica, pruebas, sindicatos docentes, gremios, profesores, universidades, escuelas publicas, escuelas privadas, escuelas charter, policy, educational policy, policy analysis, vouchers, charter schools, evaluation, educational evaluation, education reform, school reform, educational reform, educational journals, accountability, school choice, standards, higher education, academic standards, testing, assessment, public policy, teaching, journal, educational research, private schools, homeschooling, home schooling, tuition, teacher unions, educational assessment,política, política educacional, análise de política, comprovantes, escolas da carta patente, avaliação, avaliação educacional, reforma dainstrução, reforma de escola, reforma educacional, jornais educacionais, accountability, escolha da escola, educacion popular; pedagogia critica, Education Policy Analysis Archives, class size, David Berliner, Gene Glass, Michael Apple, Sherman Dorn, Gustavo Fischman, Pablo Gentili, education policy analysis archives, epaa, aape, education, Paulo Freire, reforma educativa, archivos analiticos politicas educativas, neoliberalismo, descentralizacion, evaluacion, pruebas nacionales, estandares, lectura, revista educativa, revista academica, pruebas, sindicatos docentes, gremios, profesores, universidades, escuelas publicas, escuelas privadas, escuelas charter, policy, educational policy, policy analysis, vouchers, charter schools, evaluation, educational evaluation, education reform, school reform, educational reform, educational journals, accountability, school choice, standards, higher education, academic standards, testing, assessment, public policy, teaching, journal, educational research, private schools, homeschooling, home schooling, tuition, teacher unions, educational assessment,política, política educacional, análise de política, comprovantes, escolas da carta patente, avaliação, avaliação educacional, reforma da instrução, reforma de escola, reforma educacional, jornais educacionais, accountability, escolha da escola

 


some rights reserved Readers are free to copy, display, and distribute this abstract and the associated article, as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and Education Policy Analysis Archives, it is distributed for non-commercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work. All other uses must be approved by the author(s) or EPAA. EPAA is published jointly by the Mary Lou Fulton Institute and Graduate School of Education at Arizona State University and the College of Education at the University of South Florida. Articles are indexed by Directory of Open Access Journals, ERIC, H.W. Wilson & Co, and SCOPUS. Please contribute commentary at http://epaa.info/wordpress/ and send errata notes to Sherman Dorn (epaa-editor@shermandorn.com).

 

epaa home
complete articles
editors
submit
article
submit commentary
receive publication notices
search
epaa

 

ó