TEACHER INTERVIEW
Crestwood Country Day School
August 2, 1992
Q. Influenced worklife by the head of the school?
A. Head of the School? I can't think of any. I can't find any
evidence of any school that has really influenced me in any
way.
Q. They know what they're getting when they hire you?
A. Hopefully, yeah.
Q. Can you tell me about influence of school board?
A. No. I've only worked with basically two school boards in my
21 years of teaching and in those 21 years, we're only
talking about five years where I've really been in the
employment of a school that had a school board. I have
never in those five years had any direct contact at a
professinal level with any school board member.
Q. What about the decisions they make -- have you felt that
your work life has been effected by policies that the school
board sets?
A. In those five years, no.
Q,. Five years here?
A. No. This was five years early on in my career as a teacher
in the midwest.
Q. How long have you been here?
A. I've been at this school 15 years. Now, I guess for a
school board you could consider the Board of Directors that
we have at this school, or the Board of Trustees. I guess
the only thing that I can think of in regards to this school
is the Board's mandate about Southwest studies, about
incorporating Southwest studies into our curriculum, which
has made me change my curriculum a bit. Other than that, I
can't think of anything.
Q. How did that come about, the Board mandate?
A. Well, I think it was probably suggested by the head master
who felt that Southwest studies should be an integral part
of our curriculum, and I have to agree. I think living in
the Southwest, a lot of students don't know a lot about the
various cultures that come from the Southwest and it should
be an integral part of our curriculum. While I'm from the
Midwest, there was a mandate by the state that dealt with
the history of the region, and I would assume that this is
similar to that, in a sense.
Q. So it perhaps came from the head of the school, to the
school board --
A. Who agreed and said "O.K. Let's mandate this."
Q. Influence by department chair?
A. Yeah, I guess in a way. I guess I have a pretty unique
experience because when I graduated from college and entered
the teaching profession, I acepted a position where a
certain individual was my department chairman, who I felt
very strongly about, both as an artist and as an educator,
and I really felt that his intent, his purpose of direction
in terms of the department was what it should have been. It
was easy for me because I totally agreed with it, but I
think there was a mutual influence. He influenced me and I
influenced him to the point that, let's see it must have
been about 16 years later, I became his department chairman
out here, and in terms of rapport with a teacher, whether
you're the chairman working under someone, or vice versa, it
was the best of both worlds.
Q. Was that in the public or private?
A. Both. Public 21 years ago, and private here.
Q. Influence by state and federal programs.
A. No
Q. By legal or judicial judgments?
A. Nope.
Q. Influenced by parents?
A. Nope.
Q. Parents leave you alone?
A. Well, parents for the most part leave me alone. I have had
some concerned parents but they haven't influenced me or
reshaped my way of thinking or the way I teach. The only
influences I've had is from teachers. Whether they be
teachers of mine or colleagues.
Q. Do you think that's a function of the fields that you're in,
do you think that other techers on the school campus are
free of influence of parents in the same way you are?
A. No. I think the reason is, not only parents but by school
board is, you know, state organization or whatever, I think
it's just the nature of what I teach. I think for the most
part, schools in general and particularly public schools,
some private schools, parents as well, don't have a great
concern about our education, so therefore we're left alone.
I mean, you have to really do something that boundaries upon
something obscene, or that really crosses the grain with
some social or political issues in terms of imagery that you
have kids work on before you come in contact with any of
these people.
Q. And you've found that experience to be the same in public
and private?
A. Umhum. I think more so in public than private.
Q. You were more careful in private?
A. No, I was more careful in public.
Q. That may be because your boundaries work?
A. Yeah, it was probably a little tighter and a more scrutinized
in one sense because you are part of a public domain, where
in the private institution you're not as visible, I guess to
as many people. I guess what I'm saying is that the reason
that this has not been an influence on me is because
historically schools, whether they are public or private,
hasn't found Art to be an important discipline in the
schools, so they don't concentrate so much on us as they do
on teachers in other disicplines, which is a crime.
Q. It must be negative _______. I mean the positive is that
you have more freedom in what you do.
A. Yeah, I have more freedom in what I do, but you know, there
is an aura out there that says "this isn't as important as
the science class over here or this English class over here,
this language class over here, this math class over here.
And I think that becomes a very contagious attitude and then
some students sense that. Fortunately, not all students,
but some do, so therefore they don't take the course
seriously, whatever that course might be.
Q. What do you teach?
A. Well, I teach everything. I teach ceramics, I teach art
history, I teach drawing, I teach photography, sculpture,
painting. In a small school, I'm sort of a Renaissance man.
Q. You probably see all the kids all four years.
A. Well, I don't see all the kids all four years. There's a,
the nice thing about this school is that when I became
chairman, when I was hired and became chairman of the
department I initiated a Fine Arts requirement for
graduation, which the school agreed with. So, the one year
requirement should be more but it's not, so because of that
you have most kids, I would say the majority of the students
in the upper school take an art course but they can also
satisfy that Fine Art requirement with music, so I might get
70% of the students in one course, and out of that 70% maybe
another 50 or 60% would then continue on with additional
courses.
Q. Influenced by professional organization?
A. That happens all the time. Being an active member of a
national art education association, receiving information
from them all the time, being a member of NCECA which is the
National Council for the Education of Ceramic Arts, both of
those organizations have been a huge influence on me.
Whether it is just through an annual news letter, or a
publication, or whether it's from going to a conference, I
guess I continue to be members of those organizations
because they obviously help me in my quest of being the best
teacher I can be.
Q. You are not influenced by teacher's associations?
A. No.
Q. Influenced by in-service training?
A. I am one who believes, and I guess was trained to believe to
become a sympathizer to the cause, and that is we can't
teach art effectively unless you make art, so you know, I
find that by being a practicing artist has really helped me
become a better teacher. In terms of in-service, I have yet
in my career of teaching which has now been 21 years, have
gone to an in-service that I felt was totally worthwhile.
Q. Are they offered here?
A. Very seldom. Now, I guess I could look at a conference like
the Art Educational Association conferences, and ANTECAN ?
in-service, and yes, those because they apply specifically
to me and what I do, so in that sense, yes.
Q. Influenced by students?
A. All the time. If I don't learn from my students, then I'm
not teaching students and I really believe that, and I guess
I have to really feel good about what I teach and I think
I'm privileged, more privileged than any other teacher
because the discipline I teach allows me to have so much
more rapport and to develop relationship with a student
because the subject matter that I teach is such a personal
thing. It deals with emotions, it deals with feeling, it
deals with personal statements, it deals with ideas, of
course. So yeah, we share that and I probably learn as much
from them as they do from me.
Q. Influenced by colleagues?
A. All the time. Now, how I would define a colleagues would be
a teacher whom I teach with or a teacher that I had who had
become then a colleague, which has happened to me, or a
teacher who I had, well for example; one man I'll never
forget was an instructor I had when I was in undergraduate
school who was a tremendous, well he is the reason I'm a
teacher today, as well as an artist. After undergraduate
school, I took graduate courses, not with him but at the
same university and I think my rapport then changed from
student teacher to more colleague oriented things because I
was also teaching at the time, and he was a tremendous
influence on me. I've been influenced by teachers at this
school, in various ways. Mostly in how they relate to
students or how they may approach a particular teaching
style. I've got colleagues across the country that I've
met, other people teach this same discipline but have been
an influence on me.
Q. In what you wanted to teach or how you wanted to teach?
A. Not so much what, cause you know, if you don't know what to
teach then you shouldn't be a teacher to begin with. You
know, maybe how to approach it in a different way. That's
another interesting thing about what I teach, I mean there
is more than one way to teach it. And I think those are the
kinds of influences I'm talking about, is how one relates to
a particular subject, which might be different than me but,
you know, may be in a sense has been more successful than
what my approach was.
Q. Creative attempt made to improve the classroom teaching
method?
A. Yes, why it was thwarted, I don't know. The two examples I
can give you is one, a friend of mine who took it upon
himself to change an entire curriculum, K-12 in a public
school district because it was very antiquated and very
uncreative, you know, and the existing curriculum he was
opposed, he was opposed to because it totally did not serve
the purpose by which in our program should serve. It was
anti-created, anti-individual, you know how do I say it? It
didn't allow for any sort of individualized creative
thinking, it didn't allow for any criticism, it was more or
less just a hands-on kind of program which really stifled
any set kind of creativity or freedom of thought, and he
took it upon himself to convince the school board that this
had to be changed, and it was. And this happens to be the
same person who was the department chairman who influenced
me. And then, I guess I did the same thing when I came here
because the curriculum really had no purpose, no goals. It
wasn't so much that it was anti-creative thinking or any of
that, but it was a pretty antiquated curriculum and that
curriculum was revised when I came here.
Q. So you felt support?
A. Yeah, I felt support.
Q. Failed attempt to influence you?
A. I don't understand the question.
Q. Were there rules or regulations or policies with which you
disagreed?
A. Well, yeah I guess there is, there was one and I worked
around it the best, you know, that I could. But I can't
tell if, or I don't know actually, if there is a legal
issue, but it happened here. There was a particular thing
that I wanted to do and I went through channels to request
to do this and it was denied. How I wanted to do it was
denied not that I wanted to do it, so I had to sort of
improvise another approach to doing it. Well, I guess what
I'm talking about is, we had a we'll call an intersession
which is between semesters, and is sort of a break between
semesters and we offer different kinds of courses. Well,
you know, as department chairman I think of one of the most
important things that you can do in our program is draw.
And anatomy drawing was something we hadn't done a lot of,
and this was an opportunity for those interested students to
come in for a week, all day, and focus on one things,
anatomy drawing. When you go to an art school, or to a
university, whatever, anatomy drawing is taught with nude
models. Many of the private, independent schools in this
country teach it that way, and that is the way I wanted to
approach teaching it here, so I went through the proper
channels of contacting first of all the head master,
explaining what I wanted to do, why I wanted to do it, why I
felt it was important, that you know, it would have to be
under parental permission, that no one else would be allowed
in the studio, you know, the whole bit, and explained to her
that this is done in several schools and I even stated
schools that this is actually a part of their ordinary
curriculum, and this was denied. My doubt is, why it was
denied. I think it might have been that personally she
didn't want it done and it wasn't, and the reason I got was
I think a superficial reason. I don't think it ever went to
the board, I don't think the legality of this was ever
looked into, I think this was a choice, a decision that she
wanted to make and instead of saying, (this is confidential
I hope), "I don't really feel this is a good idea", she said
she went through channels to find out and said know. Well,
I really don't believe that. So, I had to work around that,
you know teaching anatomy drawing with live models, but with
bathing suits, and you know, I think preassumptions are
always made about, you know, if you have a nude body, you
know, people are faced with a nude body, that one or two
things happend. Kids are going to get aroused, or they are
going to get embarrassed and in my 20 some years of
teaching, and its not only been in secondary schools, I've
taught in universities as well, that's not the casse. You
know, minutes after you're first confronted with a nude
model, you get down to the business of drawing, it might as
well be a chair sitting like that. Well, anyway, I had to
work around that. I guess that's the closest thing that ---
Q. Bureaucratic constraints?
A. What's it mean? It means that teacher's aren't being
allowed to do what they should be doing.
Q. In what ways?
A. I guess my response to that question could be more profound
if I was teaching in the public sector because I think they
come under more scrutiny than we do here.
Q. Who's scrutiny?
A. Well, I'm thinking of tax payers, school boards, parental
concerns, more so than what happens here, or maybe I'm on
the wrong track with this question.
Q. What do you think the sources of bureaucracy of public
schools are?
A. Too many administrators. I think education, both private
and public, I think would do a better job for the majority
of people if we had less administrative interference. I
think administrators administrate to other administrators
who administrate and I think there is just too much
bureaucracy in education and I think that really boggs down
the whole reason why we have schools. My wifes a teacher.
She teachs gifted kids in the public school system. What I
mean by gifted is the bright kids, I know gifted can be used
in various ways. A teacher left and the whole concept of
why the program is so successful is that the kids who come
there come in contact with more than one teacher, I think
they had two teachers. The one has left. She left and took
another position within the district. They've never hired
anyone else to replace her and this was before Christmas.
So they've had substitute teachers all this time and the
only reason that anyone can see as to why it has taken so
long is because of all the bureaucratic, you know, junk that
you have to sift through. So, who is really being affected
by this? One, you make a teacher very frustrated and less
effective and the kids are suffering.
Q. How much do you think _____________ function _________ to
student population?
A. Well, I don't know. We're talking about a school here that
is pre-K through 12 with around 600 students, and its
governed by a board of trustees, that's not to say we don't
have bureaucracy here because we do, but I think in a public
school district where you are dealing with, you know, many
many more students than we have, with the school board, with
you know, various heads of schools, superintendents, asst.
supt. and their assistants and so on and so on, I think it
is probably worse.
Q. How would you describe the bureaucracy here?
A. I don't know. I mean, going back to earlier questions, I've
more or less been left alone so I haven't really been faced
with much of it, but I just know because of it a lot of
times there are some decisions that could have been made
early on that haven't been made because of this.
Q. Rank activities. Only one ranking to each.
A. I guess I can't rank A first because like any discipline,
there are certain things that have to be taught, so I mean I
can't be selective about that, so I would say that my
ranking would be: 1)=B, 2)=C, 3)=D, 4)=A.
Q. Any other issues that you think I should ask about that I
haven't?
A. Oh, I don't know. I'm going through a thing right now which
is kind of interesting. I don't know how it fits in with
what you want to do here, but I am the art department
chairman for the entire school, K-12. We have, one of my
teachers is leaving because of her husband's job. So we're
in the process of hiring a new teacher. It's been quite a
frustrating experience. This is the first time that I've
every had to hire someone, _____? would be present
headmaster. I am not allowed to see recommendations but I
am the art department chairman. I have interviewed several
candidates; I have looked at over 85 resumes for this job,
and I've yet to see one letter of recommendation and I
haven't been allowed to see it, for what reason, I don't
know, I've never been told.
Q. What was the response when you asked to _______________?
A. No you can't. At this time, you are not, you can't see
them, and the people I've talked to have asked why not, and
they don't know why not. Apparently now the only person who
sees them in this school is the head master, and one other
person -- and I really find that to be a little degrading in
terms of me as department chairman because ultimately, I
think, in terms of knowing who's best suited to teach within
a discipline would me, moreso than anyone else because first
of all, they are not an art educator nor are they that in
tune with what, to make a decision as to what is good and
what is bad about art. I feel I'm more qualified, so that's
been a real interesting situation I've been into the last
few months. But I guess that is a bureaucratic thing that I
don't understand, I've not even been allowed to call any
references on these people.
Q. I don't understand.
A. I don't either. I'm not the only one who has had to go
through this -- other department chairmen have ____________?
Q. What I do with all these interviews, I kind of code them and
your name gets disassociated in some respects,
________________ that come up which _-______________ no
idea, _________________________________ other questions,
could I come back? May I have your home phone number ----