This article has been retrieved
times since July 4, 2000
Education Policy Analysis Archives | ||
Volume 8 Number 31 |
July 4, 2000 |
ISSN 1068-2341 |
|
Editor: Gene V Glass, College of Education Arizona State University
Copyright 2000, the
EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS ARCHIVES. Articles appearing in EPAA are abstracted in the Current Index to Journals in Education by the ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation and are permanently archived in Resources in Education. |
Class Pictures: Representations of Race, Gender and Ability
|
|
Abstract This article examines photographs taken of American public school classes between the 1880's and the 1940's. Most of the images were found in two virtual archives: The American Memory site at the Library of Congress and The National Archives and Record Center. These very large photograph collections were searched for representations of race, gender, and physical ability. The photographs were compared and contrasted and analyzed for elements of hidden curricula using techniques drawn from the social sciences and humanities. It was found that these large photo collections have significant gaps and historical amnesias. Collections made under conditions of racial segregation are themselves segregated and continue to reproduce images of hierarchy and dominance. To the extent these sites function as important resources for teachers and students searching for primary source documents for history and social studies projects, the archives convey significantly biased views of the history of education and minority groups in America. |
|
The Library of Congress, which has 117 million items in its archives, hopes to have four million items digitized and accessible on the World Wide Web by the turn of the century. The Denver Public Library expects to put 95,000 photographs of the old west on-line. California has linked 35 universities and museums into one on-line archive.Clearly, in a very short time most of the major historical photograph collections will go on-line thus creating a searchable data base of millions of historic images. Future developments will include search engines designed specifically to retrieve photographic images, not indirectly by a key word system but by seeking images directly. (Note 2) Mega-sites like the Library of Congress's "American Memory" digital archive with 42 separate collections and hundreds of thousands of images and the National Archives and Records Administration with 54,000 images are enormously popular. These and similar electronic archives are free and open to the public twenty-four hours a day and seven days a week. Image banks have quickly become an invaluable source of primary source data for students doing research and gathering material for reports and class projects, and they are a remarkable resource for teachers and others preparing lectures, doing research, or just browsing. (Note 3) If, as the Library of Congress name suggests, they have literally become a representation of our collective memory, an essential question becomes: What is the nature of that memory? |
A Simulacra of History? Historical Photographs on the InternetThese technological developments have opened an entirely new niche to historians and scholars of visual communication, making possible research which was unimaginable only a decade ago. (Note 4) While this is a remarkable technological advance and a general benefit for scholars and researchers, there are a number of caveats to this development, of which I will mention just two that are particularly salient to this discussion. (Note 5)The first has to do with the uses to which such freely available images may be put. As the Internet develops into what will be in effect a single archive, the meanings of the individual collections (and photographs) will tend to become submerged. Alan Sekula, posed central questions for those interested in understanding and using historical photographs: "How is historical and social memory preserved, transformed, restricted, and obliterated by photographs" (Sekula, 1983:193)? Having raised those questions, Sekula (1983:195) warned that "Photography constructs an imaginary world and passes it off as reality." He drew attention to some of the sources of error and misrepresentation in collections of historic photographs. He mentioned the fallacies of assuming that photographs "transmit truths"; "reflect reality"; or are "historical documents." "The very term document," explained Sekula, "entails a notion of legal or official truth, as well as a notion of proximity to and verification of an original event" (Sekula, 1983:198). Sekula (1983:194) has also given a great deal of thought to photographic archives, observing that ownership of photographs or photographic archives and their subsequent alienation or sale, can have important ramifications for historians and photo researchers: ... not only are the pictures in archives often literally for sale, but their meanings are up for grabs....This semantic availability of pictures in archives exhibits the same abstract logic as that which characterizes goods on the marketplace.In other words, regardless of the intent of the photographer, captions and documentary evidence preserved with the image, or attempts by the repository to control or restrict usage, these digital images can be downloaded and used in ways that may be quite antithetical to the original meanings (cf., Margolis, 1994). Ripped free from context, photographs become free floating signifiers that appear to be little snippets of reality and can be used to bolster or "prove" a variety of contradictory theses. (Note 6) The second warning has to do with meaning of such enormous archives as a wholethat is, with the ontology of the archive. What does it mean to have a media collection called "American Memory?" Jean Baudrillard (1983), the French sociologist, described the developing image world as a "simulacrum," a "hyperreal" media world of copies of copies where there is not and has never been an original. Everything in this symbol system refers to other symbols. Basic to the discussion of photographic archives is Baudrillard's (1983) observation that Abstraction today is no longer that of the map, the double, the mirror, or the concept. Simulation is no longer that of a territory, a referential being or a substance. It is the generation by models of a real without origin or reality... (p. 3)In place of the two-dimensional concepts in written history, we are faced with an (imag)inary model of history. Baudrillard described a world of allusion and trope, maps referring not to territories but only to other maps, news referring to other news, photographs referring to photographs and so on. As millions of photographs are digitized and placed online in the "American Memory," this carefully constructed and selective simulacrum will be thought of more and more as something similar to Durkheim's "conscience collectif." (Note 7) Precisely because of these twin issues, it is vital that scholars begin to seriously explore the photographic data banks (morgues?) that are growing on line. What is in the American memory? What has been forgotten? What survives in unconscious or unexamined form? What is myth, what is reality? Photographic images do provide a fresh source of data about our past, but this data has as much power to obscure as it does to reveal. It is essential to temper the "semantic availability" that stems specifically from the conversion of photographs produced with particular use values into commodities with an abstract equivalence dictated by their exchange value, by studying the development of the virtual archive and providing the kind of social and historiographic scholarship necessary to understanding. In this effort it is necessary to study both available meanings and the lacks and oversignifications of the images and the data banks: as I shall demonstrate, whole classes of photographs are not represented, while others exist in such replication and proliferation that they crowd out alternative meanings and critical perspectives. We will need to develop a new paradigm to discuss the developing simulacrum itself. How shall we conceive of a web site with hundreds of thousands of images and documents that calls itself "American Memory?" Is it a thing, a process, a reflection? What research tools might one employ to study such a complex entity and the people who use it? |
The Hidden Curriculum in Black and WhiteThis project began as a search for photographs to be used as illustrations for a series of lectures on the history of American education. At first the enormous numbers of photographs of schools, students, and teachers available on line seemed overwhelming. In an evening I found more images than I needed for three lectures. A closer look at the photographs, and the collections that they were found in, raised a simplified set of research questions informed by the issues asked by Alan Sekula: What photographs have been included? How can we understand the meaning of these photographs? What photographs were made that are not in the archives? What was not photographed?The research on class pictures was theoretically informed by an interest in socialization processes and hidden curricula having to do with the reproduction of race and gender hierarchy (Margolis and Romero, 1998). The term "hidden curriculum" was coined by Philip Jackson after he observed public school classes. He noted the peculiar disciplines and behaviors in classrooms and embedded in school practices that do not necessarily further intellectual development. Jackson (1968, p. 33) observed that students are awarded credit for "trying," rewarded for "neatness, punctuality and courteous conduct," and that negative sanctions are levied for the violation of institutional rules. The concept of hidden curriculum came to refer to the socialization that takes place in school but is not written into the formal curriculum. Socialization functions of the hidden curriculum have been further analyzed as encompassing three distinct functions. Apple and King (1977) building on the work of Elizabeth Vallance (1973) termed the first two "weak" and "strong": 1) a "weak" Durkheimian concept of the socialization essential to social life reproducing the connections to civil society that transform children into social beings able to live and work together, form social institutions, and agreed upon meanings; and, 2) a "'strong' sense of control wherein education in general and the everyday meanings of the curriculum in particular were seen as essential to the preserving of the existing social privilege, interests, and knowledge of some elements of the population at the expense of other less powerful groups. Most often this took the form of attempting to guarantee expert and scientific control in society, to eliminate or 'socialize' (acculturate, assimilate) unwanted racial or ethnic groups or characteristics or to produce an economically efficient group of citizens..." (Apple and King 1977, p. 34). Strong controls are highly visible in gender role socialization practices, in segregation and different curricula provided to different racial/ethnic groups and in the reproduction of social classes (Anyon, 1989). The third function of the hidden curriculum is the direct production of ideological belief systems, for example patriotism, certain forms of representative democracy, market capitalism, heterosexual family structures and so on. While the education literature refers to socialization curricula as "hidden" they are actually quite visible and have readily been photographed. From a critical perspective, class pictures can be viewed as an historical record of certain elements of the hidden curriculum. The photographs show bodies with certain race, gender, age, and ability characteristics spatially arranged in an environmental setting. As social scientists, historians, and educators we interpret these visible relationships as representations of social relations learned about elsewhere: segregation, integration and hierarchy, gender socialization, social class structures. Moreover, we infer that the images were not randomly produced but were carefully fashioned using agreed upon conventions of representation to be symbolic representations of such social qualities and others including: order, discipline, purity, equality, patriotism, and community pride and stability. In these photographs we can see attempts to denote social processes such as socialization, assimilation and acculturation which cannot be directly photographed. Clearly this interpretative enterprise is fraught with peril. Precisely because one cannot actually photograph social relationships, there is a fundamental issue of ethnographic sense making: we cannot be sure if we understand "from the native's perspective" what the project of photographer and her subjects entailed; nor can we ever be sure that our reading is not an error, a misplaced abstraction, or an aberrant decoding. |
In the ArchivesOnce upon a time newspapers called their collections of photographs assembled for the future obituaries of persons still living, "morgues." Now photograph collections are becoming our collective memory. This paper will focus on two of the federal government's major archives each encompassing a number of collections. The various collections were created for different purposes, in different geographic locations, in different historical periods and provide distinct and different views of school life. In essence, much like schools and America itself, the photographic collections are segregated. Separate collections offer divergent and sometimes confusing or contradictory views of race and ethnicity, social class, rural/urban life, and ability/disability. As previously discussed these collections are to some extent losing their identity and becoming submerged in the digital archive. Even though each image retains its citation and whatever provenance exists, the fact that one can search across collections by topic begins a process of homogenization. The National Archives and Records Administration, for example is not organized by collection. There are about 54,000 photographs currently available and nearly 1600 of them can be retrieved with key words "teacher, student, school" (although not all are linked to digital images). Some major collections were discovered this way: photographs from the relocation camps for Japanese Americans, photographs from the Roosevelt Library depicting African American schools in the south, photographs of the Albuquerque Indian Boarding School, and so on.The "American Memory" site run by the Library of Congress is organized by collection. While one can choose to search the entire site, one can also search each collection individually. The following chart describes some of the collections in the "American Memory" site that have large numbers of photographs of schools. Table 1
|
American Memory Site |
in Component |
"school," "teacher," or "student" |
| Architecture and Interior Design for 20th Century America: Photographs by Samuel Gottscho and William Schleisner, 1935-1955. | 29,000 | 1,479 |
| Touring Turn-of-the-Century America Photographs from the Detroit Publishing Company, 1880-1920. | 25,000 | 302 |
| America from the Great Depression to World War II: Photographs from the FSA-OWI, 1935-1945. | 56,600 | 463 |
| Built in America: Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record, 1933-Present. | 35,000 | 542 |
| American Landscape and Architectural Design, 1850- 1920, A Study Collection from the Harvard Graduate School of Design. | 2,800 | 46 |
| The Northern Great Plains, 1880-1920: Photographs from the Fred Hultstrand and F.A. Pazandak Photograph Collections. | 900 | 30 |
| Taking the Long View: Panoramic Photographs, ca. 1851-1991. | 4,000 | 149 |
| Washington as It Was: Photographs by Theodor Horydczak, 1923-1959. | 14,000 | 374 |
|
According to Bogdan and Marshall (1997, p.6), in the early
years of the century more than a billion postcards were
mailed each year and many cards depicted architectural
monuments and large-scale institutions. They were able, for
example, to collect more than sixteen hundred
different views of asylums and institutions for the
mentally ill or retarded. Figure 2 was made ten years after the North Dakota photograph and contributes a countervailing view of American schools around the turn of the century.
A large mass of students stand in front of an imposing stone building. While apparently called out of school for the photograph, the students seem to be casually milling around and much less orderly than in the rural school. No teachers or adults are in evidence; neither was an attempt made to arrange the students by size. Here too the students are all white but more homogeneous in age than in the prairie school. The images of shelter and protection are completely missing; in fact, students in the street and lounging against a telephone pole suggest urban toughness and self-sufficiency. Overall this is a photograph of a school; the building was emphasized over the students who form a faceless mass. Comprehensive high schools like this were expensive public works that were sources of civic pride. The high school views were perhaps similar to the mental institution and asylum photos discussed by Bogdan and Marshall (1997) who observed that: The initial impression the postcard pictures leave is that these institutions were orderly and therapeutic environments. One way to understand the cards is that they were part of the visual rhetoric of hegemony they helped manage the public's understanding of the legitimacy of professional control of deviance. (p. 5) |
High schools were, of course, not asylums, but when these
schools were built and these postcards circulated, the
notion of universal high school education was new. Images
such as these were reassuring, lending gravitas and
legitimacy to bold social institutions that were taking
professional custody over all children ending family
control and child labor practices that had marked history to
this point.
Figures 3 and 4 provide additional insight into the ways in which school and children were imagined at the turn of the century. The two shots were made in the same doorway, presumably the same day. The photographer has used the steps as risers and the doorway as an ornate frame, carefully posing the children to create images of order and obedience. White children are dressed in white, a symbol of innocence and purity. The imposing door, itself a metaphor for the doorway to knowledge, is forbidding. Knowledge is not depicted as an open process of personal growth or something gained in family and community. It is the property of the awe inspiring institution behind the children through which they must pass. The children are ready for the challenge. They stand at attention, equidistant, not quite touching, the girls in bonnets and white dresses the boys in what appear to be uniforms with short pants, leggings, shirts and caps.
The caption informs
us that the little boys have swords at their sides. This is
a particularly telling example of the ways in which
gendering, one of the strong elements of the hidden
curriculum, and school discipline, one of the weak elements,
were represented on film.
I reproduced the other as Figure 5. "Whites" are
only identified as such in opposition to people of color,
whereas people of color always have their ethnicity attached
as a marker and identifier. African American StudentsAs Elliott Eisner (1985, p. 97) suggested, it is important to consider the "null curriculum"that which is missing. It is, of course, not news that schools in turn-of-the-century America were segregated by race and ethnicity. But complete invisibility is surprising. None of the 300 school photos in the Detroit Photography collections showed Black, Native American or Asian children in school. If children of color were not in school, it occurred to me to look for them elsewhere in that collection. Searching the 25,000 images of the Detroit collection for "Black Children" yielded half a dozen photographs. Figure 6 is typical of these stereotyping images. This is not a candid shot nor is it documentary; it was made by the same postcard company that posed the White children in the doorway. These four children were also posed, arrayed in a line in front of their house. The image constructed had the intention of emphasizing their "otherness." They were not dressed-up, even though they may well have owned Sunday-go-to-meeting clothes. They were not posed in a meadow where bare feet might have been read as a youthful or romantic symbol.
The tableau of clapboard house and fence with clothes thrown over emphasizes their poverty. Photographic postcards of African Americans, produced for white audiences, were not as overtly racist as the popular cartoon cards of alligators, pickaninnies, and mammies (Turner 1994; Mellinger 1992). Still, Figure 6 is a clear example of what Turner termed "contemptible collectibles," postcards produced for white consumers that conformed to certain racialized stereotypes: Black children were frequently photographed outside dressed in rags and tatters. As Turner (1994, p. 16) observed: "Picture postcards featuring poorly dressed little black children romping in cotton fields suggests that if they had been given a choice, they would have chosen to spend their days in the field rather than in the schoolroom." Images of diligence, order, and innocence were never included. |
|
Curiously, while the "American Memory" site allows one to search a large number of individual collections as a group, the "The African American Odyssey," which is part of the site, must be visited separately and is not searchable for photographs. (Note 9) An expanded search of the entire "American Memory" collection for "Negro Children" produced about fifty hits, all the photographs of African American students, teachers or schools dated from the Farm Security Administration collection in the 1930's. Figure 7 is representative of a series made by Marion Post Wolcott at Prairie Farms school in Montgomery Alabama in 1939. Germany was already making war in Europe and the worst days of the depression were behind America.
The job of Farm Security
Administration photographers was shifting from the focus on
depression misery to an emphasis on America's strength and
resiliency. By the 1930's, advancing photographic
technology made it easier to take photographs inside, and
the image Post-Wolcott made shows African American students
seated reading at a table with their African American
teacher standing over helping a student. The class is small
with books and tables and chairs instead of rows of student
desks. Boys and girls seem to be working together, perhaps
reading. The choice of a new and apparently well-equipped
but segregated school creates an affirming vision of Black
America as "separate but equal." The photograph
similarly creates an image of teaching as an active and
caring activity. Other images in Post Wolcott's proof sheet
include playing basketball and volleyball in which the
teacher also takes an active role.
They show "freedom schools" for emancipated slaves. There are a number of photos of famous educators, Booker T. Washington, for example, and there are many photographs from the historical black colleges: Hampton Institute and Tuskegee Institute. Figure 8 is unique in depicting what is apparently an integrated school class in Pennsylvania in 1912. It is one of those important images that appear in historic collections with inadequate captions and provenance. The caption identifies the photo as a gift to the Schomburg by Eleanor Drayton, and we might assume that she is the Eleanor age seven in the photo. Other meanings are more problematic. Thirty students including Whites, Blacks and apparently Non-White ethnics (Native Americans? Eastern European immigrants?) were clustered together shoulder-to-shoulder on a bleacher with the African American teacher standing on the left with her arm symbolically embracing the entire class. The students probably dressed for the photograph. They do not seem sorted by race or gender. This is the clearest image of equality and diversity that I found in any of the collections searched. A good deal of research would be necessary to discover whether integrated classes were common in Espy, Pennsylvania in 1912, or if the Anglo-appearing students were immigrants whose "otherness" set them apart as well. |
|
Latinos were even more invisible than Blacks in schools. A search of the American Memory collection for Spanish American, Puerto Rican, or Mexican schools, teachers or students yielded nothing before a single image taken by Russell Lee in July 1940 with the caption: "Spanish-American farmer who is also justice of the peace and teacher in local grade school, Chamisal, New Mexico." (Note 10) The National Archive site produced a group of seven shots taken by Irving Rusinow for the Bureau of Agricultural Economics in Peñasco, New Mexico in 1941. Figures 9 and 10 are representative selections from that shoot.
In Figure 9, a long low adobe school building stands against a line of arid mountains in the background marking the geography as the Southwest and establishing a Spanish feel. The students are clearly aware of the camera; some appear to have been posed in a circle holding hands, others are wandering around as if at recess. Overall this is not an image of order like Figures 3 and 4, or of the specific relations of teaching and caring evidenced in Figures 7 and 8. In place of order, book learning or scholarship, we see playfulness. A Dominican nun approaches the circle from the right, but she is not working with or embracing the students. The image is especially interesting because of the caption: "School was built by the Catholic Church, then deeded over to the State, and most of the teachers are Catholic Sisters, though this is a public school. Sisters' salaries are paid by the State directly to the Church. Though religious teaching does not take place during the regular school period, the Sisters "naturally express the Catholic way of life, and by association with them the children cannot but receive some of the religious essence." (Father Morgan) |
|
In the last half of the 19th century Spanish speaking families in the southwest tried to escape anti-Mexican sentiments, and in particular "English only" school requirements, by sending their children to Catholic schools that they found more welcoming and less hostile to their culture. The situation reported by the photographer Rusinow suggests that by the middle of the 20th century the state was beginning to reassert control.
Figure 10, depicting a class of older female students in a
home economics class, is a familiar image of women's
traditional gender roles. The young women are apparently
making clothes for dolls as Christmas presents. Sex
segregated home economics classes are a form of vocational
education, preparing Mexican-American girls to be domestics
and mothers. (Note 11) Similar pictures were made regularly
at the Indian boarding schools showing Indian girls using
sewing machines or cooking.
Native American StudentsCompared with other racial/ethnic groups, Native American Indians were dramatically over-represented in the photo archives. They were frequently photographed as part of the documentation of federally-funded Indian boarding schools, and as official records these images were preserved in large numbers. The American Memory site produced about sixty hits on "Indian School" and the National Archives and Record Center site yielded 106. Figure 11 is a panorama of the Mt. Pleasant Indian Industrial School. In the collection, there are a number of additional panoramas showing the buildings and grounds of Indian Schools in Phoenix, Arizona, Santa Fe, New Mexico, and Carlisle, Pennsylvania, and other places. The Mount Pleasant panorama is an interesting composition. Female students in white dresses were placed in small groups and circles around the grounds.
The image of the "industrial school" belies its
name by presenting a peaceable view of grounds including a
formal pond and young girls holding hands ("Ring-a-
ring-a-roses, A pocket full of posies"). While clearly
we are looking at an institution, nothing in the image tells
us that Mount Pleasant was an "Indian" school.
The pastoral scene, manufactured by architecture, costume,
gendering and photography, suggests gentility and
civilization without any hint of the struggle for the hearts
and minds of Indian children: removed from family and
community; locked in this institutional compound; sent to
boarding school to become White.
|
|
Figure 12 depicts young Indian Boys at the Albuquerque Indian School. The image is one of symmetry and order. Wearing uniforms and holding American flags, the children were posed quite formally, arrayed as a design around an Anglo American woman (teacher? supervisor? guard?) who stands in the center of the composition. Uniforms are a very important element both of the schooling experience and of the photographic images.
Uniforms were part of the original concept for Indian schools: Captain Richard Pratt who originated the concept, dressed the losers in uniforms similar to the cavalry that defeated them, and then regimented them like soldiers (PBS Video, 1991). In the photo, uniforms submerge individuality and produce an image of both conformity and interchangeable parts; moreover, they accomplish what Goffman (1976, p. 32) termed "function ranking" removing any ambiguity or status inconsistency. They also serve to strip the children of their native identity. (Note 13) The woman's lack of uniform makes her the only individual and sets her apart. Taller than any of the children, eyes fixed firmly on the lens, the woman holds her arms stiffly at her side. In the midst of a group she stands alone, not touching any of the students. Her position is quite different from the teachers in Figure 1, who stand among the students but to the side and are depicted on the same level; or Figure 7 where the teacher seems to make a gesture of inclusion; or Figure 8 where the teacher is symbolically lowering herself to the students' level. The caption material in the Archive reads: "This is one of a small collection of photographs of the Albuquerque Indian School, which was established in 1881 to provide off-reservation industrial training to the Indians of the Southwest. By 1912, the school had 8 primary grades and over 300 students; by 1925 enrollment increased to over 800 students and grades 11 and 12 were added. The Albuquerque Indian School continued operating until 1982, when its program was transferred to the Santa Fe Indian School." |
|
As the photographs make clear, the Indian school's curriculum of socialization and acculturation was not at all hidden. They were consciously created as industrial training centers to train the students for working class occupations and jobs in white society. The fact that most returned to reservations where these jobs did not exist was conveniently overlooked. Asian StudentsA small set of photos of Chinese children emerged from a search of the "American Memory" site. Figure 13 is representative of a single shoot showing an unnamed group of Chinese at about the turn of the century posed on a rooftop. They were made by the famous western photographer William Henry Jackson.
He made a number of
exposures of the same family, but he left no firm date,
location, or discussion of the occasion for the shoot. (Note
14) I find these photographs similar to the Detroit
collection's images of Blacks: they share the stereotyping
feel of photographs of the exotic "other." The
first segregated school for Chinese students was opened in
San Francisco in 1885, and rigid segregation was enforced
until 1905 when the board of education allowed Chinese
students into a regular city high school. In 1906 a
separate school in San Francisco was established for
Japanese, Korean, and Chinese children (Spring 1997, p. 76).
Perhaps photographs of these schools can be found in
California.
The occasion was the rounding up of
Japanese families so that they could be shipped to
relocation camps. The choice of patriotic images, saluting
the flag, clearly advanced a view of Japanese as patriotic
and law-abiding Americans. Figure 15, also by Lange, shows
a school class in Manzanar. Students with what appears to
be a Japanese teacher are hard at work reading and writing.
They have the same sort of modern desks and chairs that can
be seen in Figure 7. The hidden curriculum portrayed in the
relocation photographs is an unabashed patriotism
illustrative of school's role in the direct reproduction of
ideological belief systems. As the captions indicate, these
are a class of photographs taken not to showcase school
children but demonstrate to the world that the United States
relocation camps for Japanese citizens were much different
from concentration or POW camps. They featured images of
well-equipped schools, caring teachers, and happy willing
students.
DiscussionAlong with all the other historical photographs in the archives, class pictures are becoming part of a modern hidden curriculum as well. Web access in schools is making historical photographs into a "curriculum" of primary source materials for teachers preparing classes and for students doing projects. There are many implications of this development for how students are taught about American history in general and specifically about the schools and students who came before them. As the preceding analysis demonstrates, the record encompassed by these photographs is full of holes. Some views are over-represented, while whole groups of students and types of schools are simply absent. This is likely the case whether one searches for school- related photographs or photos in any other category. |
|
There are two central issues in the implied critique of the World Wide Web: In the first place one must consider what exists at this point in time. Clearly the historical photograph collections currently available on line reproduce the familiar historic amnesias, lapses and sins of omission, while continuing to overemphasize powerful, dominant and hegemonic structures. In this way it resembles the historiography of the first half of the 20th century with its great men theories and inattention to workers, to women, and to people of color. The photo archives valorize assimilation models, a peaceful bucolic past, upward mobility, and order at the expense of cultural diversity, domination and conflict. The second question has to do with the potential of the Web to offer a different vision. Because it is global, decentralized, and offers open access it is quite probable that some of these deficiencies will be overcome. If archives are opened to images from all sources: personal collections, small local history societies, private collectors, newspapers and so on, it is easy to imagine that a search for schools, teachers, students would return a far more heterogeneous selection. However, even if all extant photographs of schools were to be made available as digital on-line images, we would still be confronted by the deficiencies of photography itself. Many things were not photographed. I found, for instance, no views of teacher unions or organizing activities, no photographs of school boards or teacher meetings where the central decisions shaping schooling were made. There were no photographs of conflicts and tensions in schoolsbetween teachers and students, among students, between school boards and communities. No pictures of discipline and punishment. No photographs of boredom. And even if such photos did emerge, they would not solve the central problem of the photograph; photography is powerless to represent some things. I argue in an earlier piece (Margolis, 1999) that it is not possible to photograph social relationships. My example in that article was, that although photographs could represent the coal mining process and technological divisions of labor, they could not capture the social relations of production which remain invisible: ownership, alienation, exploitation, fear, and so on. Similarly, photography can capture the physical relationships of schools, but cannot make visible the social relationships of education: failure, intellectual excitement, oppression, resistance, or teaching/learning. These are multidimensional concepts that cannot be reduced to a visual icon. Recognizing the inherent limitations of visual images is critical if one intends to use them as other than propaganda vehicles. Given that, there are many ways that photographs can be used by historians of education, not just as illustrations to make textbooks and lectures visually interesting, but as primary source data. The preceding analysis should be taken as only suggestive, as most of the issues raised need to be investigated on their own and in more depth. This paper is meant simply as a provocative introduction, indicative of new avenues for educational research. In effect, it opens a space analogous to an environmental niche which can be explored and settled in a number of ways. As suggested earlier, there is room for the application of additional analytical techniques including quantitative methods to many of these issues. One might ask questions about the frequencies and ratios of certain types of representations, and about their correlations. It should be possible to statistically compare geographic regions and/or historical periods. It is likely that changes in representation can be seen over time. For example, one might hypothesize that the number of photographs showing integrated classrooms increases since 1954. In some locations there exists a fairly dense and complete photographic record, allowing a kind of retrospective rephotography project to be done. Researchers could collect and arrange in sequence photographs taken at the same school over decades in order to examine and analyze social change. For instance, some of the Indian schools appear to have left a fairly detailed photographic record from the 1880's through the 1930's. It would be interesting to examine the change in these images over half a century. (Note 15) Additionally, much might be learned from cross-cultural investigations. One might compare, for example, images of order and discipline in class pictures taken in England, Japan, and the U.S. As well as asking diachronic and comparative questions, synchronic questions need to be addressed in more depth. Careful historical analysis of the people, places, and occasions photographed is necessary. What can be discovered about the actual school, the children, teachers and communities? What can be learned about the photographers, the occasions upon which the photographs were made? How can other documentary evidence shed light on the images, and vice versa? The conventional touchstones of historical research: newspapers, school and government records, census data and so on need to be consulted and cross-referenced with the images (Margolis 1988). (Note 16) Where possible, it might be extremely fruitful to employ oral history and ethnography to gather additional information. It seems likely that it would still be possible to find and interview students depicted in pictures made in the 1930's, for instance. More recent history, for example the period following Brown v. The Board of Education in 1954, could be even more useful both because participants are available to study and because the sheer volume of photographs probably increased. The techniques of the visual anthropologist photo elicitation, inventories of various types and surveys can be employed to examine, for instance, issues relating to the inequalities of "separate but equal" or same gender schools (cf., Collier and Collier 1986). It should also be clear that the study of school photographs is not only a historical undertaking. Social science researchers can examine current collections of school photographs: year book photographs, sports pictures, class pictures, the huge collections of snapshots and vernacular pictures found in virtually every school. One might do interesting research simply with the bulletin boards (or more recently web sites) found in many grade school classes. These constitute different simulacra, image worlds manufactured by students, parents, and school personnel. These images can be studied in much the same way, examining both the actual occasions and intentions governing the production of the photographs, the apparent symbolic meanings, and selection, juxtaposition and arrangement for display. Photographs produced as part of school culture, like historical photos, can be analyzed as icons with symbolic, iconic and indexical meanings. (Note 17) NotesThe author would like to acknowledge Jon Wagner and Mary Romero whose comments on earlier drafts of the article were extremely helpful in framing the argument. Marina Gair helped with copy editing on the final draft and obtaining photograph permissions.
ReferencesAnyon, J. (1989). Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work. In J. H. Ballantine (Ed.), Schools and Society (pp. 257-279). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Pres. Apple, M. & King, N. P. (1977). What do schools teach? In R. H. Weller (Ed.), Humanistic Education (pp. 29-63). Berkeley, CA: McCutcheon. Baudrillard, J. (1983). The Precession of Simulacra. Art and Text, no. 11, September, 3-47.
Bogdan, R. and Marshall, A. (1997). Views of the Asylum:
Picture postcard depictions of institutions for people with
mental disorders in the early 20th century. Visual
Sociology, 12, 4-27.
Collier, J. and Collier, M. (1986). Visual
Anthropology: Photography as a Research Message Method.
Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
Digitized Artifacts are Making Knowledge Available to All,
On Line. (1998, November 29). The New York Times,
p. 21.
Dreeben, R. (1986). On What is Learned in School.
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Durkheim, E. (1961). Moral Education. (Everett K.
Wislon and Herman Schnurer, Trans.). New York: The Free
Press. (Original work published 1925)
Eisner, E. (1985). The Educational Imagination
(2
Frankenberg, R. (1993). White women, race matters: the
social construction of whiteness. Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
Goffman, Erving. (1976). Gender Advertisements.
New York: Harper and Row.
Jackson, P. (1968). The daily grind. In P. Jackson (Ed.),
Life in classrooms (pp. 33-37). New York: Holt,
Rinehart and Winston.
Klett, M. et al. (1984). Second View: The
rephotographic survey project. Albuquerque, NM:
University of New Mexico Press.
Klett, M. (1991). Rephotographing Oklahoma
1889/1991. Oklahoma City, OK: Oklahoma City Art
Museum.
Lesiak, Christine an Jones, Matthew (producers). (1991).
In the White Man's Image [PBS video]. (An episode of
the series on "The American Experience").
Margolis, E. (1998). Picturing Labor: Photographs of the
Coal Mine Labor Process. Visual Sociology, 13 (2),
5-35.
Margolis, E. and Romero, M. (1998). "The Department
is Very Male, Very White, Very Old, and Very
Conservative": The Functioning of the Hidden Curriculum
in Graduate Departments. Harvard Educational Review,
68 (1), 1-32.
Margolis, E. (1994). Images in Struggle: Photographs of
Colorado Coal Camps. Visual Sociology, 9, (1), 4-26.
Margolis, E. (1988). Mining Photographs: Unearthing the
Meaning of Historical Photos. Radical History Review,
40 (January), 32-48.
Mellinger, W. M. (1992). Representing Blackness in the
White Imagination: Images of 'Happy Darkeys' in Popular
Culture, 1893-1917. Visual Sociology, 7 (7), 3-
21.
Nadin, M. Zakia, R.D. and Nadin, M. (1995) Creating
Effective Advertising : Using Semiotics Consultant
Press.
Rieger, J. H. (1996). Photographing Social Change.
Visual Sociology, 11 (1), 5-49.
Romero, M. (1992). Maid in the U.S.A. New York:
Routledge.
Rosler, M. (1990). in, around, and afterthoughts (on
documentary photography). The Contest of Meaning.
Cambridge, MIT Press.
Sekula, A. (1990). The Contest of Meaning.
Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sekula, A. (1983). Photography Between Labor and Capital.
In Benjamin H. D. Buchloh and Robert Wilkie (Eds.),
Mining Photographs and Other Pictures: A Selection from
the Negative Archives of Shedden Studio, Glace Bay, Cape
Breton. 1948-1968 (p. 194). Halifax, Nova Scotia: The
Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design.
Solomon-Godeau, A. (1991). Photography at the Dock:
Essay on Photographic History, Institutions, and
Practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press.
Spring, J. (1997). Deculturalization and the Struggle
for Equality (2
Steiner, Kathy. (October 15, 1995). Finding Photographs.
(Kathy Steiner/ILS 603)/Besser). Can be found on the Web:
http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/impact/f95/Papers-
projects/Papers/steiner.html
Tractenberg, A. (1989). Reading American Photographs:
Images as History Matthew Brady to Walker Evans. New
York: Hill and Wang, The Noonday Press.
Turner, P. A. (1994). Ceramic Uncles and Celluloid
Mammies: Black images and their influence on culture.
New York: Anchor Books.
Vallance, E. (1973-1974). Hiding the hidden curriculum.
Curriculum Theory Network, 15.
Web AddressesNational Archives and Records Administration: New York Public Library Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture: Digital Schomburg: The Hultstrand site: The Detroit collection:
About the AuthorEric MargolisDivision of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies College of Education Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona 85287-1411 Eric Margolis is a sociologist and Assistant Professor in the Division of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, Arizona State University College of Education. Recent publications include: The Department is Very Male, Very White, Very Old, and Very Conservative: The Functioning of the Hidden Curriculum in Graduate Sociology Departments (with Mary Romero) Harvard Educational Review (Vol. 68 1998); AIDS Research/AIDS Policy: Competing Paradigms of Science and Public Policy, Research in Social Policy, Vol. 6 (1998) JAI Press; and Hidden Curricula in Higher Education (in press) Routledge. |
Copyright 2000 by the Education Policy Analysis ArchivesThe World Wide Web address for the Education Policy Analysis Archives is epaa.asu.edu General questions about appropriateness of topics or particular articles may be addressed to the Editor, Gene V Glass, glass@asu.edu or reach him at College of Education, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-0211. (602-965-9644). The Commentary Editor is Casey D. Cobb: casey.cobb@unh.edu . EPAA Editorial Board
|