Cheating in the first, second, and third degree: Educators' responses to high-stakes testing

Audrey Amrein-Beardsley; David C. Berliner; Sharon Rideau

Journal Help

Article Tools

Indexing metadata

How to cite item

Email this article (Login required)

Email the author (Login required)

Related Articles Cimbricz, S. (2002). State–mandated testing and teachers' beliefs and practice. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2). Retrieved August 12, 2009 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n2.html

Haladyna, T., Nolen, S. B., & Haas, N. S. (1991). Raising standardized test scores and the origins of test score pollution. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 2–7.

McGill–Franzen, A. & Allington, R. L. (1993). Flunk’em or get them classified: The contamination of primary grade accountability data. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 19–22.

Suen, H. K., & Yu, L. (2006). Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam. Comparative Education Review, 58 (1), 46-65. Retrieved April 14, 2010 from http://suen.educ.psu.edu/~hsuen/pubs/Suen & Yu CER.pdf

Font Size

About The Authors

Audrey Amrein-Beardsley
Arizona State University
United States

David C. Berliner
Arizona State University

Sharon Rideau

Notifications

View
Subscribe / Unsubscribe

The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

Alternatively, you can also download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link below.

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Download this PDF file Fullscreen Fullscreen Off