https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/issue/feedEducation Policy Analysis Archives2026-03-24T00:00:00+00:00EPAA/AAPEepaa@asu.eduOpen Journal Systemseducation policy analysishttps://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/10300Continuing the conversation: “Life is Good”—David Berliner's legacy2026-03-12T17:00:00+00:00Jeanne M. Powersssmcb@asu.eduGustavo E. Fischmanssmcb@asu.eduBethAnn Berlinerssmcb@asu.eduBrett A. Berlinerssmcb@asu.eduAudrey Amrein-Beardsleyssmcb@asu.eduTom Baronessmcb@asu.eduCarole G. Basilessmcb@asu.eduLenay Dunnssmcb@asu.eduGlen Harveyssmcb@asu.eduCatherine Walcottssmcb@asu.eduNikki Filbyssmcb@asu.eduGene V Glassssmcb@asu.eduJames Harveyssmcb@asu.eduMargarita Pivovarovassmcb@asu.eduRich Shavelsonssmcb@asu.eduKevin Welnerssmcb@asu.edu<p>Throughout his journey from applied researcher to world-renowned scholar, David Berliner was committed to education research that matters—not just within academic circles, but within classrooms and communities. As a public intellectual and a fierce advocate for public education, David expertly and courageously engaged in education debates, bridged research with practice, debunked myths and exposed misinformation, and in the process, reshaped how we understand education. This special issue of <em>EPAA/AAPE</em> celebrates David Berliner's legacy as a scholar, and more importantly, as someone who was deeply respected and cherished. What follows are personal essays by family members, friends, and colleagues that engage with David's ideas and inspire us to continue the conversations that David valued and fought for.</p> <p>A complete list of his <em>EPAA/AAPE</em> articles may be found at: <strong><a href="https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/DavidBerliner">David C. Berliner Collection | Education Policy Analysis Archives</a></strong></p> <p>David Berliner's article, <strong><a href="https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/679">Educational Reform in an Era of Disinformation</a></strong> (1993) was the second article published in<em> EPAA/AAPE</em>. It launched David’s career as a scholar of educational policyand formed the basis of his award-winning book with Bruce Biddle, <em>The Manufactured Crisis. </em></p>2026-03-17T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Jeanne M. Powers, Gustavo E. Fischman, BethAnn Berliner, Brett A. Berliner, Audrey Amrein-Beardsley, Tom Barone, Carole G. Basile, Lenay Dunn, Glen Harvey, Catherine Walcott, Nikki Filby, Gene V Glass, James Harvey, Margarita Pivovarova, Rich Shavelson, Kevin Welnerhttps://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/10169From Salamanca to the present: Configurations and tensions in initial teacher education for inclusion2026-02-18T15:09:33+00:00Javier Campos-Martínezjavier.campos@uach.clConstanza Herrera-Sedaconstanza.herrera.s@usach.clCecilia Millánceciliapazmlarivera@gmail.comMaría Beatriz Fernándezmbeatriz.fernandez@uchile.cl<p>This introductory article examines advances, setbacks, and challenges in the programs of initial teacher education for inclusion, 30 years after the Salamanca Declaration. Drawing on recent international reports, policy documents, and empirical research, the article provides an updated overview of challenges facing teacher education, including persistent inequalities and the limited diversification of the teaching workforce. It situates inclusive education as a contested field shaped by policy developments and uneven institutional responses across contexts. The article reviews key conceptual shifts in the understanding of inclusion, moving beyond disability-centered approaches toward broader perspectives, and analyzes how these shifts have reshaped expectations of the teaching profession. It also identifies ongoing limitations within initial teacher education, such as deficit-based approaches and curricular fragmentation. Finally, the article introduces and contextualizes the contributions that compose the special issue, outlining how each article addresses these challenges from different contexts and analytical approaches.</p>2026-02-24T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Javier Campos-Martínez, Constanza Herrera-Seda, Cecilia Millán, María Beatriz Fernándezhttps://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/10048Advancing equitable access to quality education globally: Innovations in curriculum, teacher education, and professional development2026-01-13T08:05:05+00:00Maria Teresa TattoMaria.Tatto@asu.eduTrevor Muttontrevor.mutton@education.ox.ac.uk<p>This article introduces the special issue “Advancing Equitable Access to Quality Education Globally: Innovations in Curriculum, Teacher Education, and Professional Development,” featuring articles that report on a multi-country project examining the challenges and opportunities of globalization for three types of reforms that have seen significant innovation in the past decade. These reforms encompass the school curriculum, teachers' education, and teachers' professional development (collectively referred to in this article as SCTEPD). The reporting countries were undergoing rapid transformation that incorporated the three reforms when we began our work, and included: India, New Zealand, Peru, Scotland, and Wales. This introductory article offers a retrospective and prospective discussion of global reforms in three key areas of SCTEPD, providing context for the articles that follow. In this introductory article, we use Cohen and Mehta's (2017) theoretical framework to analyze these reforms, aiming to understand the conditions that lead to successful, lasting reforms and the extent to which these reforms have increased equity and quality in education for all learners.</p>2026-01-13T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Teresa Tatto, Trevor Muttonhttps://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/9929Introduction to the special issue: Science of Reading policies2025-11-07T15:53:04+00:00Rachael Gabrielrachael.gabriel@uconn.eduDanielle V. Dennisdanielle_dennis@uri.edu<p>Over the past decade, a wave of literacy policy reforms—often framed under the banners of the “Science of Reading” (SoR) and the “right to read”—has spread internationally from England to the United States, Canada, Australia, and Aotearoa/New Zealand. These reforms, while consistent in their emphasis on structured approaches to early reading instruction, have sparked significant controversy and debate. This special issue examines the global phenomenon of literacy-focused education reform, exploring how reading is constructed as a policy problem and mobilized through political agendas, media narratives, and privatized intermediary organizations. Contributors analyze the complex interplay between policy implementation and educational infrastructure, revealing how reforms influence not only pedagogy but also curriculum, assessment, professional development, and leadership. Drawing on diverse international contexts and methodological approaches, the papers interrogate the consequences of centralized control, rapid implementation, and market-driven solutions. Findings suggest that despite widespread adoption, SoR-related policies have not consistently led to improved outcomes or equity and often exacerbate systemic issues such as racial and linguistic oppression. The issue highlights the dangers of politically driven pedagogy and the erosion of educational expertise, raising critical questions about accountability, democratic governance, and the future of literacy education.</p>2025-11-11T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Rachael Gabriel, Danielle V. Dennishttps://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/9781Introduction to the special issue: Education privatisation and commercialisation in the context and aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic2025-09-18T12:11:01+00:00Sue Wintonswinton@edu.yorku.caNicole Mocklernicole.mockler@sydney.edu.au<p>While different forms of privatisation and commercialisation of education have existed since at least the 1990s, the global COVID-19 pandemic of 2020-2022 created opportunities for the integration of private and commercial interests in public education to be turbo-charged. In this introduction to the special issue, we place its articles featuring country case studies from Italy, Brazil, and the United Kingdom in context, providing some historical and conceptual background to the forms, impacts and pathways of privatisation and commercialisation of education. We argue, based on our reading of the three articles in this collection and of the literature more broadly, that the education crisis brought about by the global pandemic swiftly opened the doors to new private actors and new forms of public-private partnerships. Due to the enduring nature of many of the relationships established over the course of the crisis, we observe the longer-term impacts in the form of expanded and intensified reach of the global education industry and more entrenched forms of privatisation and commercialisation of education in many contexts worldwide.</p>2025-09-23T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Sue Winton, Nicole Mocklerhttps://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/9507Reimagining the practicum: Toward an inclusive, critical, and socially just initial teacher education2025-07-16T03:16:19+00:00Ignacio Figueroa-Céspedesignacio.figueroa@mail.udp.clYolanda Muñoz-Martínezyolanda.munozm@uah.clEsteban Fica-Pinolesteban.fica2025@umce.clClaudia Guiralclaudia.guiral@uah.es<p>The practicum is a privileged space for professional learning, although its transformative potential is limited by technocratic approaches and fragmented curricula that hinder the connection between experiences and critical perspectives on inclusion and social justice. This qualitative study analyzes the experience of 14 Primary Education pre-service teachers at a Spanish university who participate in reflective practicum seminars, in order to understand how these structures contribute to the development of an inclusive and critical professional identity. Drawing on field notes, recordings, and four semi-structured interviews, we conducted a reflexive thematic and interpretative phenomenological analysis. Four experiential cores were identified: (a) the divide between academic knowledge and school reality; (b) the emergence of guided ethical reflection and inclusive agency; (c) the experience of uncertainty and collaborative learning around critical incidents; and (d) an active defense of inclusion in the face of training gaps observed across practicum groups. The results show that the seminars provide a space to process the “reality shock” and translate inclusive values into situated decisions, suggesting that reshaping the practicum through a social-justice-oriented lens is essential for preparing teachers as agents of change.</p>2026-03-10T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Ignacio Figueroa-Céspedes, Yolanda Muñoz-Martínez, Esteban Fica-Pinol, Claudia Guiralhttps://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/9447Literacy policy design: An analysis of coordination instruments in six northeastern states2025-09-11T19:18:28+00:00Karoline de Oliveirakaroline.deoliveira2@gmail.comCatarina Ianni Segattocatarina.segatto@gmail.com<p>The recent emergence of age-appropriate literacy programs in Brazilian states highlights the importance of this topic on state executives' agendas, as well as the diffusion of the PAIC model from Ceará, although few studies have focused on analyzing these initiatives. This article aims to map these programs and systematize their design and instruments used. The study adopted a qualitative methodological approach, based on literature analysis and documentary research conducted on state education department websites, including laws, ordinances, decrees, and news related to six states in northeastern Brazil: Alagoas, Maranhão, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, and Sergipe. In summary, the research demonstrates that these programs share a similar, systemic design that includes normative, financial, technical-pedagogical support, logistical and material support, enforcement and qualification, and agreement-based instruments, although there are variations in the configuration of each instrument.</p>2026-02-10T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Karoline de Oliveira, Catarina Ianni Segattohttps://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/9413Erased from the permanent record: Data collection practices and non-binary student experiences in school2025-09-07T15:35:12+00:00Ashley J. Careyashleycarey.ac@gmail.comPeter Piazzappiazza1@stonehill.edu<p>State education data systems often undercount non-binary students, constraining schools’ ability to support them. This study examines the scope and implications of non-binary erasure in school data collection. Drawing on survey responses from nearly 13,000 students across seven Massachusetts districts, we find that current practices substantially undercount non-binary students, who also report less positive experiences of school culture, including student–teacher relationships, belonging, and emotional safety. Although inclusive data could guide efforts to create more supportive environments, districts face growing political resistance from parent organizations aligned with the White Christian Nationalist movement. These groups frame inclusivity as a threat to parental rights. We argue that state-level policies mandating inclusive gender data practices are needed to affirm the presence of non-binary students, protect districts from politicized backlash, and enable leaders to prioritize equity in school improvement.</p>2026-03-03T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Ashley J. Carey, Peter Piazzahttps://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/9398State capacities of municipal education departments: Diagnosis and reforms2025-07-18T11:02:20+00:00Fernando Abruciofernando.abrucio@fgv.brRafael Rodrigues Viegasviegas.r.r@gmail.comGabriel Corrêagabrielbcorrea@gmail.com<p>This article seeks to answer the following research question: how does the quality of public management serve as a fundamental element for the success of municipal educational policies? To this end, it uses the concept of state capacities and proposes an analytical model to understand the current situation of municipal education departments and how they can enhance their structures and operations to improve educational performance. Finally, it offers reform suggestions to strengthen the state capacities of municipal education departments.</p>2025-11-25T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Fernando Abrucio, Rafael Viegas, Gabriel Corrêahttps://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/9346“Nightmares” and “horror stories”: Experiences of higher education staff navigating public service loan forgiveness2025-11-24T17:17:31+00:00Z. W. Taylorztaylor@gsu.eduElizabeth Raineyerainey1@fordham.eduDebra Carterdeb.carter28@ku.eduAllison Maldonadoamaldo01@stanford.eduDana Georgeddgeorge@ua.eduPatrick Zieglerpatrick.ziegler@earnest.comKarla Weber Wandelkarla.weber@wisc.edu<p>The Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program has not been investigated through the eyes of borrowers working in the field of higher education. This study engages with 30 full-time higher education professionals from 26 different institutions of higher education to share their experiences navigating PSLF. Through Bronfenbrenner’s (1979, 1994) ecological systems theory, findings suggest borrowers struggled with PSLF’s complexity and suffered from poor or absent communication from the U.S. Department of Education, loan servicers, and institutional employers. Ultimately, borrowers felt forced to seek support outside of these entities to matriculate through PSLF. Implications for research, policy, and practice are addressed.</p> <p> </p>2026-03-10T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Z. W. Taylor, Elizabeth Rainey, Debra Carter, Allison Maldonado, Dana George, Patrick Ziegler, Karla Weber Wandel