https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/issue/feed Education Policy Analysis Archives 2026-09-22T00:00:00+00:00 EPAA/AAPE epaa@asu.edu Open Journal Systems education policy analysis https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/10306 Regulation and normative rulemaking: Tensions amidst curricular flexibilization and standardization policies in Brazil (2017-2025) 2026-03-17T06:06:10+00:00 Monica Ribeiro da Silva monicars03@gmail.com Cleverson José dos Santos cleverson.santos@ufpr.br <p>This article discusses the processes of regulation and rulemaking of the determinations of the Law n. 13.415/17 (New Secondary Education) at state level, considering Brazilian federalism and drawing upon empirical data retrieved from the states of the southern region of Brazil. This is documentary research with content analysis procedures according to Bardin (2021). The main results indicate a process that is strained by centralization and decentralization mechanisms resulting, at the same time, in curricular diversification and standardization through the reproduction of propositions found in the document of the National Common Curricular Basis for Secondary Education—a process related to the prerogatives of Brazilian federalism.</p> 2026-09-15T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Monica Ribeiro da Silva, Cleverson José dos Santos https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/10300 Continuing the conversation: “Life is Good”—David Berliner's legacy 2026-03-12T17:00:00+00:00 Jeanne M. Powers ssmcb@asu.edu Gustavo E. Fischman ssmcb@asu.edu BethAnn Berliner ssmcb@asu.edu Brett A. Berliner ssmcb@asu.edu Audrey Amrein-Beardsley ssmcb@asu.edu Tom Barone ssmcb@asu.edu Carole G. Basile ssmcb@asu.edu Lenay Dunn ssmcb@asu.edu Glen Harvey ssmcb@asu.edu Catherine Walcott ssmcb@asu.edu Nikki Filby ssmcb@asu.edu Gene V Glass ssmcb@asu.edu James Harvey ssmcb@asu.edu Margarita Pivovarova ssmcb@asu.edu Rich Shavelson ssmcb@asu.edu Kevin Welner ssmcb@asu.edu <p>Throughout his journey from applied researcher to world-renowned scholar, David Berliner was committed to education research that matters—not just within academic circles, but within classrooms and communities. As a public intellectual and a fierce advocate for public education, David expertly and courageously engaged in education debates, bridged research with practice, debunked myths and exposed misinformation, and in the process, reshaped how we understand education. This special issue of <em>EPAA/AAPE</em> celebrates David Berliner's legacy as a scholar, and more importantly, as someone who was deeply respected and cherished. What follows are personal essays by family members, friends, and colleagues that engage with David's ideas and inspire us to continue the conversations that David valued and fought for.</p> <p>A complete list of his <em>EPAA/AAPE</em> articles may be found at: <strong><a href="https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/DavidBerliner">David C. Berliner Collection | Education Policy Analysis Archives</a></strong></p> <p>David Berliner's article, <strong><a href="https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/679">Educational Reform in an Era of Disinformation</a></strong> (1993) was the second article published in<em> EPAA/AAPE</em>. It launched David’s career as a scholar of educational policyand formed the basis of his award-winning book with Bruce Biddle, <em>The Manufactured Crisis. </em></p> 2026-03-17T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Jeanne M. Powers, Gustavo E. Fischman, BethAnn Berliner, Brett A. Berliner, Audrey Amrein-Beardsley, Tom Barone, Carole G. Basile, Lenay Dunn, Glen Harvey, Catherine Walcott, Nikki Filby, Gene V Glass, James Harvey, Margarita Pivovarova, Rich Shavelson, Kevin Welner https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/10169 From Salamanca to the present: Configurations and tensions in initial teacher education for inclusion 2026-02-18T15:09:33+00:00 Javier Campos-Martínez javier.campos@uach.cl Constanza Herrera-Seda constanza.herrera.s@usach.cl Cecilia Millán ceciliapazmlarivera@gmail.com María Beatriz Fernández mbeatriz.fernandez@uchile.cl <p>This introductory article examines advances, setbacks, and challenges in the programs of initial teacher education for inclusion, 30 years after the Salamanca Declaration. Drawing on recent international reports, policy documents, and empirical research, the article provides an updated overview of challenges facing teacher education, including persistent inequalities and the limited diversification of the teaching workforce. It situates inclusive education as a contested field shaped by policy developments and uneven institutional responses across contexts. The article reviews key conceptual shifts in the understanding of inclusion, moving beyond disability-centered approaches toward broader perspectives, and analyzes how these shifts have reshaped expectations of the teaching profession. It also identifies ongoing limitations within initial teacher education, such as deficit-based approaches and curricular fragmentation. Finally, the article introduces and contextualizes the contributions that compose the special issue, outlining how each article addresses these challenges from different contexts and analytical approaches.</p> 2026-02-24T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Javier Campos-Martínez, Constanza Herrera-Seda, Cecilia Millán, María Beatriz Fernández https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/10048 Advancing equitable access to quality education globally: Innovations in curriculum, teacher education, and professional development 2026-01-13T08:05:05+00:00 Maria Teresa Tatto Maria.Tatto@asu.edu Trevor Mutton trevor.mutton@education.ox.ac.uk <p>This article introduces the special issue “Advancing Equitable Access to Quality Education Globally: Innovations in Curriculum, Teacher Education, and Professional Development,” featuring articles that report on a multi-country project examining the challenges and opportunities of globalization for three types of reforms that have seen significant innovation in the past decade. These reforms encompass the school curriculum, teachers' education, and teachers' professional development (collectively referred to in this article as SCTEPD). The reporting countries were undergoing rapid transformation that incorporated the three reforms when we began our work, and included: India, New Zealand, Peru, Scotland, and Wales. This introductory article offers a retrospective and prospective discussion of global reforms in three key areas of SCTEPD, providing context for the articles that follow. In this introductory article, we use Cohen and Mehta's (2017) theoretical framework to analyze these reforms, aiming to understand the conditions that lead to successful, lasting reforms and the extent to which these reforms have increased equity and quality in education for all learners.</p> 2026-01-13T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Teresa Tatto, Trevor Mutton https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/9967 School-safety law, local discretion, and the boundaries of protected speech: A Tennessee case study 2026-06-11T19:43:58+00:00 Dustin Hornbeck d.hornbeck@memphis.edu <p>In this paper, I offer a critical case study of how a state law aimed at preventing mass violence in schools has been applied to restrict expression, both inside and outside educational settings. Tennessee’s threat-of-mass-violence statute has produced felony charges, expulsions, and detentions for students as young as 10, and, in its most extreme application, the arrest and five-week incarceration of a retired police officer for sharing a political meme with no connection to any school. This case raises questions about the interpretive reach of educational laws. Using the Foucauldian concept of governmentality, I examine how this educational policy extended beyond educational settings and into a politically charged context. I use a set of documented cases, anchored by one extreme and well-documented example, to explore the legal ambiguity and discretionary power embedded in a single state policy. This study contributes to an understanding of how education policy can intersect with civil liberties, especially when enacted in an era of heightened polarization and public concern over school violence.</p> 2026-09-08T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Dustin Hornbeck https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/9933 Setbacks in Brazilian educational policies: An analysis based on youth and adult education (2015-2022) 2026-03-01T05:22:44+00:00 Rubens Luiz Rodrigues rubensluizrodrigues65@gmail.com Flaviane Ferreira da Silva flaviane.fv@gmail.com Rayla Dias rayladias19@outlook.com Mírian Teixeira Carneiro miriancarneirojf@gmail.com <p>This article analyzes educational policies for the schooling of young people and adults in Brazil between 2015 and 2022. It starts from this analytical question: how did the socioeconomic and ideopolitical resurgence present in Brazilian society between 2015 and 2022 mark educational policies for the schooling of young people and adults? The objectives are: to analyze the effects of the capitalist crisis in the Brazilian context on the schooling of young and adult workers and to demonstrate the meaning of the setbacks in Youth and Adult Education (EJA, acronym in Portuguese) policies, focusing on the National Education Plan (2014-2025), the National Literacy Plan (PNA), and the National Program for the Integration of Professional Education with Basic Education in the Youth and Adult Education Modality (Proeja). As a methodological procedure, a bibliographic survey and document analysis were carried out to understand the schooling processes of young people and adults. The findings reinforce that resistance and overcoming setbacks in EJA imply re-establishing this modality as a universal right and as an instrument of critical education from the perspective of social transformation.</p> 2026-08-25T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Rubens Luiz Rodrigues, Flaviane Ferreira da Silva, Rayla Dias, Mírian Teixeira Carneiro https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/9929 Introduction to the special issue: Science of Reading policies 2025-11-07T15:53:04+00:00 Rachael Gabriel rachael.gabriel@uconn.edu Danielle V. Dennis danielle_dennis@uri.edu <p>Over the past decade, a wave of literacy policy reforms—often framed under the banners of the “Science of Reading” (SoR) and the “right to read”—has spread internationally from England to the United States, Canada, Australia, and Aotearoa/New Zealand. These reforms, while consistent in their emphasis on structured approaches to early reading instruction, have sparked significant controversy and debate. This special issue examines the global phenomenon of literacy-focused education reform, exploring how reading is constructed as a policy problem and mobilized through political agendas, media narratives, and privatized intermediary organizations. Contributors analyze the complex interplay between policy implementation and educational infrastructure, revealing how reforms influence not only pedagogy but also curriculum, assessment, professional development, and leadership. Drawing on diverse international contexts and methodological approaches, the papers interrogate the consequences of centralized control, rapid implementation, and market-driven solutions. Findings suggest that despite widespread adoption, SoR-related policies have not consistently led to improved outcomes or equity and often exacerbate systemic issues such as racial and linguistic oppression. The issue highlights the dangers of politically driven pedagogy and the erosion of educational expertise, raising critical questions about accountability, democratic governance, and the future of literacy education.</p> 2025-11-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Rachael Gabriel, Danielle V. Dennis https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/9923 School coexistence policies between democracy and control: Multilevel policy reconfigurations in Mexico and Morelos 2026-02-03T17:56:24+00:00 Erika Rivero e.rivero@crim.unam.mx <p>This study examines school coexistence policy in Mexico as a dynamic process of configuration, translation, and reconfiguration across multiple levels, from its normative formulation to its appropriation in school practice. Adopting a qualitative sociocritical approach, a multilevel design was developed that articulates the analysis of national policy frameworks, their recontextualization in the state of Morelos, and their interpretation in the practices of primary and secondary school teachers and principals. The analysis was guided by dimensions derived from the paradigms of control and sanction, and democratic coexistence. The findings show that the policy is configured as a hybrid structure marked by tension, in which formative orientations coexist with regulatory <em>dispositifs,</em> with a predominance of a logic of control and risk management, particularly at the local level. This is reinforced by institutional conditions and contexts shaped by violence and insecurity. Nevertheless, in school practice, teachers and principals reconfigure policy through situated strategies that prioritize relationships and the pedagogical meaning of coexistence. The study contributes to understanding school coexistence as a field of tensions among normative regulation, institutional conditions, and teacher agency.</p> 2026-08-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Erika Rivero https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/9917 Certificates without learning: Effects of automatic promotion in Mexico 2026-02-03T15:17:44+00:00 Barbara Alejandra Sandoval-Gayosso sandoval.gayosso@gmail.com Ana Esther Escalante Ferrer Anaexcalante7@hotmail.com <p>Primary school teachers face multiple challenges stemming from the public policy of automatic promotion implemented in Mexico since 2013, aimed at ensuring school access and retention. This policy has intensified preexisting difficulties and generated new ones, including declining school attendance, the devaluation of schooling and the teaching profession, and issues associated with addressing student diversity and learning gaps, understood as the mismatch between expected learning outcomes and curricular standards. Within a qualitative paradigm, analogical hermeneutics was articulated as an inductive procedure within grounded theory to analyze teachers’ perceptions in urban primary schools in the Mexican states of Veracruz and Morelos. One of the most relevant findings is the devaluation of schooling, which weakens teachers’ pedagogical authority and reconfigures interactions with families. The elimination of grade retention has reduced shared family responsibility, shifting the focus from attendance and learning toward certificate attainment. This suggests that, historically, the value attributed to teachers and schools has rested more on ensuring credentialing than on guaranteeing meaningful learning.</p> 2026-07-28T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Barbara Alejandra Sandoval-Gayosso, Ana Esther Escalante Ferrer https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/9887 Governmentality and psychopolitics in education: The case of regulating cell phone use in Brazilian schools 2025-12-08T11:32:12+00:00 Jean Lucas da Silva Queiroz jeanlucas.nac@gmail.com Andressa Fernandes Pivato pivatoandressa@gmail.com <p>This article examines education policy on cellphones in schools through a qualitative documentary analysis of Law 15.100/2025, Decree 12.385/2025, CNE/CEB Resolution No. 2/2025, and the MEC RED collection. Drawing on governmentality, psychopolitics, and neoliberal rationality, and employing framing, critical discourse analysis (CDA), and WPR<em>,</em> or<em> What’s the Problem Represented to be?</em>, we analyze how the policy constructs the problem of cellphone use, allocates responsibility, and configures techniques of conduct. The findings indicate a shift of risk from digital platforms to students’, families’, and schools’ behavior, strengthening local accountability and affective self‑regulation. The literature suggests only partial coherence between the diagnosis (attention economy, youth mental distress) and instruments (ban, awareness, and pastoral care), with limited corporate co‑responsibility and a lack of safety by design. Evidences suggest that the curricularization of “digital education” consolidates the pedagogization of the norm. We conclude that adequate protection requires combining school‑level restrictions with structural regulation (algorithmic transparency, protective defaults, and privacy/safety by design), realigning responsibility toward platforms and the state.</p> 2026-03-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Jean Lucas da Silva Queiroz, Andressa Fernandes Pivato