Reclassification of English Learners

Authors

  • James B. Grissom Standards and Assessment Division - California Department Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v12n36.2004

Abstract

Ron Unz, originator of Proposition 227, claimed, prior to the passage of Prop. 227, that the five percent annual reclassification rate of English learners to fluent English proficient indicated bilingual education was a failure. Critics of Prop. 227 have countered that the annual reclassification rate has changed little since the passage of Prop. 227, indicating the new legislation had no effect on reclassification rates. Unfortunately, the annual reclassification rate does not provide a clear indicator of how long it takes students to be reclassified after entering the school system. To better estimate reclassification rates for English learners in California, cohorts were created to track the same groups of students over time. Ron Unz also claimed that test scores for immigrant students improved dramatically after the passage of Prop. 227. To evaluate his claim, average test scores were calculated by language fluency. Based on statewide data from three different cohorts tracked across four years, Prop. 227 has had no effect on reclassification rates or test scores.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2004-07-30

How to Cite

Grissom, J. B. . (2004). Reclassification of English Learners. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12, 36. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v12n36.2004

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)