ROTC Policy Regarding Homosexuals

Lee S. Duemer

Abstract


This is a policy analysis, in a historical context, of how Association of American University institutions responded to Reserve Officer Training Corps policy excluding homosexuals. The time period for this study is 1982 to 1992. Qualitative methods are used to analyze data and arrive at conclusions. Secondary data provide additional depth and background. This study reveals seven different positions institutions have taken in response to ROTC policy, these include: supporting ROTC policy, neutrality, collective action, barring military recruiters from campus, distancing the institution from ROTC, and changing the campus climate. This includes examples taken from AAU institutions and rationales behind making policy decisions.

Keywords


Educational History; Educational Policy; Higher Education; Homophobia; Homosexuality; Institutional Role; Military Training; Qualitative Research

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v5n9.1997

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


Discussion




Contact EPAA//AAPE at Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College