Alexander v. Sandoval:A Setback for Civil Rights
Keywords: Supreme Court Lawsuits Civil Rights Act of 1964 Fourteenth Amendment Discrimination
AbstractThis article confronts the serious implications of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, Alexander v. Sandoval, which eliminated an important legal avenue for civil rights plaintiffs. For over 35 years, individuals have been allowed to bring lawsuits directly challenging violations of rights set forth in the federal regulations implementing Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Because these actions could be grounded in proof of disparate impact, rather than discriminatory intent, they allowed for some claims that could not go forward under other legal authorities, such as the Fourteenth Amendment. While the author concludes by identifying key remaining options, he highlights the real damage done by this decision.
Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Welner, K. G. (2001). Alexander v. Sandoval:A Setback for Civil Rights. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9, 24. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v9n24.2001
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License, whereby the author retains the copyright, and which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited, the changes to the work are identified, and the same license applies to the derivative work. Works prior to October 2019 will display a different license (CC-BY-NC-SA; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0)