Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam

S. G. Grant

Abstract


Education Week's report "Quality Counts" judges New York State's curriculum and assessment policy efforts to be an "A." Surface-level reviews such as "Quality Counts" tell something about the workings of state policy, but they are more useful as snapshots than as well-developed portraits of curriculum and assessment change. In this article, I analyze the new New York State Global History and Geography standards and tests using a set of social studies-specific criteria which inquire deeply into the implications for real instructional change. From that vantage, I argue that New York's policy efforts, while seemingly well-intentioned and reflective of surface-level change, fail to promote powerful teaching and learning in social studies. Teachers intent on producing ambitious teaching and learning will find little to interfere with their efforts. But as a set of reforms intended to encourage substantive change, the new global history test falls short.

Keywords


Curriculum; New York; Geography; Social Studies; Policy

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v9n39.2001

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


Discussion




Contact EPAA//AAPE at Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College