Findings vs. Interpretation in “The Long-Term Impacts of Teachers” by Chetty et al.

Authors

  • Moshe Adler Columbia University and the Harry Van Arsdale, Jr. Center for Labor Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v21n10.2013

Keywords:

Value added, teacher evaluation.

Abstract

The authors of the study “The Long-Term Impact of Teachers” claim that their study shows that increases in teacher value-added lead to significant and lasting increases in test scores and significant increases in income that will last throughout adulthood. Instead, I show that these claims are false because they are contradicted by the findings of the study itself. In fact, the results of the Chetty et al. study raise serious questions about the benefits of using the value-added method for evaluating teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Moshe Adler, Columbia University and the Harry Van Arsdale, Jr. Center for Labor Studies

Author of Economics for the Rest of Us: Debunking the Science that Makes Life Dismal, The New Press, 2010

Downloads

Published

2013-01-30

How to Cite

Adler, M. (2013). Findings vs. Interpretation in “The Long-Term Impacts of Teachers” by Chetty et al. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21, 10. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v21n10.2013

Issue

Section

Articles