Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

“Making the Difficult Choice”: Understanding Georgia’s Test-Based Grade Retention Policy in Reading

PDF

Published: 2015-05-11

Author

Andrew Prescott Huddleston

Abilene Christian University

Keywords: Bourdieu; high-stakes testing; literacy; social promotion; test-based grade retention

Abstract

The author uses Bourdieu’s concepts of field, capital, and habitus to analyze how students, parents, teachers, and administrators are responding to Georgia’s test-based grade retention policy in reading at one Georgia elementary school. In this multiple case study, the author interviewed, observed, and collected documents regarding ten fifth graders, their parents, teachers, and administrators. Within the field of test-based retention, the students and parents brought cultural, social, and economic capital that received little value, and they readily accepted that the Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests (CRCT) was trustworthy and retention was fair. However, believing that retaining students would ultimately reproduce the inequities the policy claimed to address, the teachers and administrators used an appeals procedure to ensure that retention was not based solely on test scores.      

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Andrew Prescott Huddleston

Abilene Christian University

Andrew P. Huddleston is an assistant professor of Teacher Education at Abilene Christian University. He received his Ph.D. in Language and Literacy Education from The University of Georgia in 2012. His research interests focus on high-stakes testing policies in reading.
PDF

Published: 2015-05-11

How to Cite

Huddleston, A. P. (2015). “Making the Difficult Choice”: Understanding Georgia’s Test-Based Grade Retention Policy in Reading. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 51. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1716