Teacher work motivation in the era of extrinsic incentives: Performance goals and pro-social commitments in the service of equity

Main Article Content

Abstract

Mindful of the withering of high-stakes accountability and disappointing data from pay for performance evaluations in the US, we ask why management by extrinsic incentives and organizational goal setting may have been far less powerful than designers of accountability and extrinsic incentive systems had expected. We explore how system-generated motives (e.g., attaining specific organizational goals, preventing sanctions, or garnering rewards) stack up against autonomously generated, intrinsic, or service motives.? We found through both quantitative and qualitative data that for teachers in the charter schools a constellation of public service motives pre-dominated: diffuse pro-social commitments, ideologies of fairness and equity, a belief in the moral deservingness of deprived student populations in opposition to societal neglect, and identification with one’s work as a personal calling. By comparison, monetary rewards were embraced as already deserved. Neither rewards, nor accountability, seemed to regulate behavior in a deep way. Prestige was not bestowed by official performance statuses within the accountability system, but flowed from judgments, personally communicated, by students, parents, or colleagues who had direct contact with teachers’ work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mintrop, R., & Ordenes, M. (2017). Teacher work motivation in the era of extrinsic incentives: Performance goals and pro-social commitments in the service of equity. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, 44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2482
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Rick Mintrop, University of California, Berkeley

Rick Mintrop is a professor in the Graduate School of Education and faculty director of the Doctoral Program in Leadership for Educational Equity at the University of California, Berkeley. In the field of school improvement, his areas of research are school accountabilty, work motivation, teaching evaluation, university-district partnerships, and continuous quality improvement. His recent book is entitled Design-Based School Improvement: A Practical Guide for Education Leaders (Harvard Education Press, 2016).

Miguel Ordenes

Miguel Ordenes is a doctoral candidate in Policy and Organization Studies in the Graduate School of Education at the University of California, Berkeley. His research focuses on understanding how self-interest and ethics of service shape teacher commitment to student learning in high poverty schools.