ROTC Policy Regarding Homosexuals

Lee S. Duemer

Abstract


This is a policy analysis, in a historical context, of how Association of American University institutions responded to Reserve Officer Training Corps policy excluding homosexuals. The time period for this study is 1982 to 1992. Qualitative methods are used to analyze data and arrive at conclusions. Secondary data provide additional depth and background. This study reveals seven different positions institutions have taken in response to ROTC policy, these include: supporting ROTC policy, neutrality, collective action, barring military recruiters from campus, distancing the institution from ROTC, and changing the campus climate. This includes examples taken from AAU institutions and rationales behind making policy decisions.

Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
 

This article has been viewed: 8105 times since March 21, 1997



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.



school logo Contact EPAA//AAPE at
Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College

 

 

this site is powered by Open Journal Systems and Wordpress