Collegiate Grading Practices and the Gender Pay Gap
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n10.2000Keywords:
College Students, Females, Grading, Higher Education, Income, Models, Sex DifferencesAbstract
Extending research findings by R. Sabot and J. Wakeman-Linn (1991), this article presents a theoretical analysis showing that relatively low grading quantitative fields and high grading verbal fields create a disincentive for college women to invest in quantitative study. Pressures on grading practices are modeled using higher education production functions.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2000-01-27
How to Cite
Dowd, A. C. (2000). Collegiate Grading Practices and the Gender Pay Gap. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 10. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n10.2000
Issue
Section
Articles