Were the student’s actions a manifestation of the student’s disability? The need for policy change and guidance

Authors

  • Maria M. Lewis Pennsylvania State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2880

Keywords:

policy implementation, special education, education law, student discipline

Abstract

Under federal special education law, before a school district may discipline a student with a disability for greater than 10 days, it must first determine whether the student’s actions were a manifestation of his or her disability (IDEA, 2004). This requirement, referred to as manifestation determination review (MDR), aims to ensure that students with disabilities do not experience a significant disciplinary change in placement for actions that are caused by their disabilities. This article will discuss the evolution of the legal standard and the policy implications of a study that examined 80 MDR decisions in one large urban school district. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maria M. Lewis, Pennsylvania State University

Maria M. Lewis is an assistant professor in the Department of Education Policy Studies and a faculty affiliate in the Law School at Pennsylvania State University. Her research is situated at the intersection of education law and policy, particularly as it relates to equity and diversity. 

Downloads

Published

2017-05-22

How to Cite

Lewis, M. M. (2017). Were the student’s actions a manifestation of the student’s disability? The need for policy change and guidance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, 50. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2880

Issue

Section

Articles