Collegiate Grading Practices and the Gender Pay Gap

Alicia C. Dowd

doi:10.14507/epaa.v8n10.2000

ISSN 1068-2341

Language

EPAA/AAPE is a peer-reviewed, open-access, international, multilingual, and multidisciplinary journal designed for researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and development analysts concerned with education policies. EPAA/AAPE accepts unpublished original manuscripts in English, Spanish and Portuguese without restriction as to conceptual and methodological perspectives, time or place. EPAA/AAPE publishes issues comprised of empirical articles, commentaries, and special issues at roughly weekly intervals, all of which pertain to educational policy, with direct implications for educational policy.

Why Publish With EPAA?
Submit a Manuscript or Revision
EPAA's Open Access Policy
Register

About The Author

Alicia C. Dowd
Cornell University

Alicia C. Dowd is Senior Lecturer in the Department of Education, Cornell University. Her research and teaching focus on educational equity and access. Current research projects include studies of the influence of tuition and tuition subsidies on the educational attainments of community college students; student equity in community college financing in New York State; and the influence of school-college partnerships on human capital development and institutional change. She received her Ph.D. in 1998 from Cornell University, where she studied educational administration, with a focus on higher education. In 1998-99, she played a role in creating the Institute for Community College Development at Cornell University, which provides leadership development opportunities to community college administrators and faculty members. Prior to completing graduate studies, she was a staff member for over ten years at Cornell's School of Continuing Education and Summer Sessions, where she was involved in developing and marketing academic programs.

Notifications

Collegiate Grading Practices and the Gender Pay Gap

Alicia C. Dowd

Abstract

Extending research findings by R. Sabot and J. Wakeman-Linn (1991), this article presents a theoretical analysis showing that relatively low grading quantitative fields and high grading verbal fields create a disincentive for college women to invest in quantitative study. Pressures on grading practices are modeled using higher education production functions.

Keywords

College Students; Females; Grading; Higher Education; Income; Models; Sex Differences

Full Text:

PDF

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n10.2000

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

_{Metrics powered by PLOS ALM}

Discussion

Contact EPAA//AAPE at Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College

education policy analysis archives

Collegiate Grading Practices and the Gender Pay Gap

Abstract

Keywords

Full Text:

Article Metrics

Discussion